* variables is always in instantaneous equilibrium with another set of
* variables that evolves on a slower time scale.
*
+ * Another case where we *could* eliminate a variable but do not want to
+ * is where that additional variable is introduced in the first place to work
+ * around some other problem. As an example, consider the time dependent
+ * version of the biharmonic problem we consider in step-47 (as well as some
+ * later ones). The equations we would then be interested in would read
+ * @f{align*}{
+ * \frac{\partial u(\mathbf x,t)}{\partial t} + \Delta^2 u(\mathbf x,t) &=
+ * f(\mathbf x,t).
+ * @f}
+ * As discussed in step-47, the difficulty is the presence of the fourth
+ * derivatives. One way in which one can address this is by introducing
+ * an auxiliary variable $v=\Delta u$ which would render the problem into
+ * the following one that only ever has second derivatives which we know
+ * how to deal with:
+ * @f{align*}{
+ * \frac{\partial u(\mathbf x,t)}{\partial t} + \Delta v(\mathbf x,t) &=
+ * f(\mathbf x,t),
+ * \\
+ * v(\mathbf x,t)-\Delta u(\mathbf x,t) &= 0.
+ * @f}
+ * Here, the introduction of the additional variable was voluntary, and
+ * could be undone, but we don't want that of course. Rather, we end
+ * up with a differential-algebraic equation because the equations do
+ * not have a time derivative for $v$.
+ *
* Rather than show how to solve the trivial (linear) case above, let us
* instead consider the situation where we introduce another variable $v$ that
* is related to $u$ by the nonlinear relationship $v=u^p$, $p\ge 1$: