Replace time measurements by the optimized ones.

git-svn-id: https://svn.dealii.org/trunk@5224 0785d39b-7218-0410-832d-ea1e28bc413d

diff --git a/deal.II/doc/tutorial/chapter-2.step-by-step/step-12.data/results.html b/deal.II/doc/tutorial/chapter-2.step-by-step/step-12.data/results.html
index f93881c8f578ac0b6264127f107ad0034c0ad993..9a99b27f15dd6a895b3cfd27ab39f3b45a33fe19 100644 (file)
--- a/deal.II/doc/tutorial/chapter-2.step-by-step/step-12.data/results.html
+++ b/deal.II/doc/tutorial/chapter-2.step-by-step/step-12.data/results.html
@@ -9,48 +9,48 @@ files including the grids, and the solutions given in gnuplot format.
 Cycle 0:
    Number of active cells:       64
    Number of degrees of freedom: 256
-Time of assemble_system1: 0.26
-Time of assemble_system2: 0.22
+Time of assemble_system1: 0.04
+Time of assemble_system2: 0.04
 solution1 and solution2 do not differ.
 Writing grid to <grid-0.eps>...
 Writing solution to <sol-0.gnuplot>...
 Cycle 1:
    Number of active cells:       112
    Number of degrees of freedom: 448
-Time of assemble_system1: 0.47
-Time of assemble_system2: 0.39
+Time of assemble_system1: 0.08
+Time of assemble_system2: 0.08
 solution1 and solution2 do not differ.
 Writing grid to <grid-1.eps>...
 Writing solution to <sol-1.gnuplot>...
 Cycle 2:
    Number of active cells:       214
    Number of degrees of freedom: 856
-Time of assemble_system1: 0.89
-Time of assemble_system2: 0.73
+Time of assemble_system1: 0.16
+Time of assemble_system2: 0.15
 solution1 and solution2 do not differ.
 Writing grid to <grid-2.eps>...
 Writing solution to <sol-2.gnuplot>...
 Cycle 3:
    Number of active cells:       415
    Number of degrees of freedom: 1660
-Time of assemble_system1: 1.78
-Time of assemble_system2: 1.43
+Time of assemble_system1: 0.31
+Time of assemble_system2: 0.27
 solution1 and solution2 do not differ.
 Writing grid to <grid-3.eps>...
 Writing solution to <sol-3.gnuplot>...
 Cycle 4:
    Number of active cells:       796
    Number of degrees of freedom: 3184
-Time of assemble_system1: 3.29
-Time of assemble_system2: 2.76
+Time of assemble_system1: 0.59
+Time of assemble_system2: 0.52
 solution1 and solution2 do not differ.
 Writing grid to <grid-4.eps>...
 Writing solution to <sol-4.gnuplot>...
 Cycle 5:
    Number of active cells:       1561
    Number of degrees of freedom: 6244
-Time of assemble_system1: 6.61
-Time of assemble_system2: 5.4
+Time of assemble_system1: 1.15
+Time of assemble_system2: 1.06
 solution1 and solution2 do not differ.
 Writing grid to <grid-5.eps>...
 Writing solution to <sol-5.gnuplot>...
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ coincide. The difference measured in time of treating each face only
 once (second version of the DG method) in comparison with treating
 each face twice within a nested loop over all cells and all faces of
 each cell (first version), is much less than one might have
-expected. The gain is less than 20% on all refinement steps.
+expected. The gain is less than 10% on the last refinement steps.
 </p>
 
 <p> First we show the solutions on the initial mesh, the mesh after two