.

git-svn-id: https://svn.dealii.org/trunk@9008 0785d39b-7218-0410-832d-ea1e28bc413d

diff --git a/deal.II/doc/tutorial/chapter-2.step-by-step/step-15.data/intro.tex b/deal.II/doc/tutorial/chapter-2.step-by-step/step-15.data/intro.tex
index fff1678e5a212b8d6afea820fc84755312e83eb4..4a1d49268bfe9f3d0a6e8b2cf56fd793e77399ff 100644 (file)
--- a/deal.II/doc/tutorial/chapter-2.step-by-step/step-15.data/intro.tex
+++ b/deal.II/doc/tutorial/chapter-2.step-by-step/step-15.data/intro.tex
@@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ is that if you don't have a good line search, good stopping criteria, the
 right metric (scalar product) for the gradient method, and a good refinement
 criterion, then the nonlinear solver gets stuck quite readily for this highly
 nonlinear problem. Initially, I was hardly able to find solutions for which
-the energy dropped below 0.01, while the energy after the final iteration of
+the energy dropped below 0.005, while the energy after the final iteration of
 the program as it is is usually around 0.0003, and down to 3.5e-5.
 
 However, this is not enough. In the program, we start the solver on the coarse