* On the other hand, when talking about finite elements and degrees of
* freedom, <i>components</i> are not always the correct concept because
* components are not always individually addressable. In particular, this is
- * the case for @refGlossPrimitive "non-primitive finite elements". Similarly,
+ * the case for @ref GlossPrimitive "non-primitive finite elements". Similarly,
* one may not always <i>want</i> to address individual components but rather
* sets of components — e.g. all velocity components together, and
* separate from the pressure in the Stokes system, without further splitting
* the velocities into their individual components. In either case, the
- * correct concept to think in is that of a @ref GlossBlockFE "block". Since
+ * correct concept to think in is that of a @ref GlossBlock "block". Since
* each component, if individually addressable, is also a block, thinking in
* terms of blocks is most frequently the better strategy.
*