use doxygen style for html tables with border

diff --git a/examples/step-20/doc/results.dox b/examples/step-20/doc/results.dox
index 8f43a30be99fa4d143da57c3324aef7b2a85fc90..abd88fce739147e1a3b3fe0efe436147c390f861 100644 (file)
--- a/examples/step-20/doc/results.dox
+++ b/examples/step-20/doc/results.dox
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ the program run.
 
 If one does this, one finds the following pattern for the $L_2$ error
 in the pressure variable:
-<table align="center" border="1" cellspacing="3" cellpadding="3">
+<table align="center" class="doxtable">
   <tr>
     <td></td>
     <td colspan="3" align="center">Finite element order</td>
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ experimentally observed ones indicated in the last row of the table.
 
 One can make the same experiment with the $L_2$ error
 in the velocity variables:
-<table align="center" border="1" cellspacing="3" cellpadding="3">
+<table align="center" class="doxtable">
   <tr>
     <td></td>
     <td colspan="3" align="center">Finite element order</td>

diff --git a/examples/step-29/doc/results.dox b/examples/step-29/doc/results.dox
index 3185cdad21d5a082c391544213cb014c4b9260b3..a7bf550135077e2c340415ba260e32becf1ba111 100644 (file)
--- a/examples/step-29/doc/results.dox
+++ b/examples/step-29/doc/results.dox
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ DEAL::Generating output... done (0.720528s)
 The graphical output of the program looks as follows:
 
 
-<table align="center" border="1" cellspacing="3" cellpadding="3">
+<table align="center" class="doxtable">
   <tr>
     <td>
       <img src="https://www.dealii.org/images/steps/developer/step-29.v.png" alt="v = Re(u)">
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ Because colorful graphics are always fun, and to stress the focusing
 effects some more, here is another set of images highlighting how well
 the intensity is actually focused in $x$-direction:
 
-<table align="center" border="1" cellspacing="3" cellpadding="3">
+<table align="center" class="doxtable">
   <tr>
     <td>
       <img src="https://www.dealii.org/images/steps/developer/step-29.surface.png" alt="|u|">

diff --git a/examples/step-31/doc/results.dox b/examples/step-31/doc/results.dox
index b92d010eafe50121810df2d89171e992664e59ab..9bedcf55297cfa8b4a60b725966b2d6aa1d05b7f 100644 (file)
--- a/examples/step-31/doc/results.dox
+++ b/examples/step-31/doc/results.dox
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ The program runs for a while. The temperature field for time steps 0,
 500, 1000, 1500, 2000, 3000, 4000, and 5000 looks like this (note that
 the color scale used for the temperature is not always the same):
 
-<table align="center" border="1" cellspacing="3" cellpadding="3">
+<table align="center" class="doxtable">
   <tr>
     <td>
         <img src="https://www.dealii.org/images/steps/developer/step-31.2d.solution.00.png" alt="">
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ equation we have chosen.
 In addition to the pictures above, the following ones show the
 adaptive mesh and the flow field at the same time steps:
 
-<table align="center" border="1" cellspacing="3" cellpadding="3">
+<table align="center" class="doxtable">
   <tr>
     <td>
         <img src="https://www.dealii.org/images/steps/developer/step-31.2d.grid.00.png" alt="">
@@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ Visualizing the temperature isocontours at time steps 0,
 50, 100, 150, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, and 800 yields the
 following plots:
 
-<table align="center" border="1" cellspacing="3" cellpadding="3">
+<table align="center" class="doxtable">
   <tr>
     <td>
         <img src="https://www.dealii.org/images/steps/developer/step-31.3d.solution.00.png" alt="">
@@ -408,7 +408,7 @@ Here is what we get for
 $\beta=0.01, \beta=0.1$, and $\beta=0.5$, different choices of $c_k$, and
 bilinear elements (<code>temperature_degree=1</code>) in 2d:
 
-<table align="center" border="1" cellspacing="3" cellpadding="3">
+<table align="center" class="doxtable">
   <tr>
     <td>
         <img src="https://www.dealii.org/images/steps/developer/step-31.timestep.q1.beta=0.01.png" alt="">
@@ -484,7 +484,7 @@ elements as well. Here are the graphs for bi-quadratic shape functions
 (<code>temperature_degree=2</code>) for the temperature, while we
 retain the $Q_2/Q_1$ stable Taylor-Hood element for the Stokes system:
 
-<table align="center" border="1" cellspacing="3" cellpadding="3">
+<table align="center" class="doxtable">
   <tr>
     <td>
         <img src="https://www.dealii.org/images/steps/developer/step-31.timestep.q2.beta=0.01.png" alt="">

diff --git a/examples/step-32/doc/results.dox b/examples/step-32/doc/results.dox
index 6e62c9e8cebd58a5e77b0f413ee228c68060d96d..39568baae410a6dc6093fc841c7062f74e46cec9 100644 (file)
--- a/examples/step-32/doc/results.dox
+++ b/examples/step-32/doc/results.dox
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ meshes had around 72,000 and 236,000 cells, for a total of 2,680,000
 and 8,250,000 degrees of freedom, respectively, more than an order of
 magnitude more than we had available in step-31:
 
-<table align="center" border="1" cellspacing="3" cellpadding="3">
+<table align="center" class="doxtable">
   <tr>
     <td>
         <img src="https://www.dealii.org/images/steps/developer/step-32.3d.cube.0.png" alt="">

diff --git a/examples/step-37/doc/results.dox b/examples/step-37/doc/results.dox
index db5fb60b7b9f1afc3f070986f27320183cc09d2f..2e933735c95d797943914d459cf729831fd22fb4 100644 (file)
--- a/examples/step-37/doc/results.dox
+++ b/examples/step-37/doc/results.dox
@@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ support, i.e., four operations on doubles can be done with one CPU
 instruction, which is heavily used in FEEvaluation), optimized mode, and two
 MPI ranks.
 
-<table align="center" border="1">
+<table align="center" class="doxtable">
   <tr>
     <th>&nbsp;</th>
     <th colspan="2">Sparse matrix</th>

diff --git a/examples/step-48/doc/results.dox b/examples/step-48/doc/results.dox
index bc4b029f3b2142c0e3ef4237c338cff595d0180e..baad8d29480f2ac3f0660d5c10352e6b9b96ea17 100644 (file)
--- a/examples/step-48/doc/results.dox
+++ b/examples/step-48/doc/results.dox
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ wave equation (the sine-term skipped from the sine-Gordon equation). We use
 both second and fourth order elements. The results are summarized in the
 following table.
 
-<table align="center" border="1">
+<table align="center" class="doxtable">
   <tr>
     <th>&nbsp;</th>
     <th colspan="3">wave equation</th>

diff --git a/examples/step-51/doc/results.dox b/examples/step-51/doc/results.dox
index 6d88fd76a102172fce77d56a7b76faf0c9e4691f..284f3ac5986f442852fe568e5d9972cc8b8bed65 100644 (file)
--- a/examples/step-51/doc/results.dox
+++ b/examples/step-51/doc/results.dox
@@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ problems). Let us look at
 the computing time of the tutorial program and the share of the individual
 components:
 
-<table align="center" border="1">
+<table align="center" class="doxtable">
   <tr>
     <th>&nbsp;</th>
     <th>&nbsp;</th>

diff --git a/examples/step-59/doc/results.dox b/examples/step-59/doc/results.dox
index 2c6f975c76649ea3cf16a12690b22505efe9309c..541e84055c492eb32b47082312dbdb11dad674dc 100644 (file)
--- a/examples/step-59/doc/results.dox
+++ b/examples/step-59/doc/results.dox
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ million degrees of freedom solved per second (MDoFs/s) to be able to compare
 the efficiency of the different degrees, which is computed by dividing the
 number of degrees of freedom by the solver time.
 
-<table align="center" border="1">
+<table align="center" class="doxtable">
   <tr>
    <th>degree</th>
    <td>1</td>
@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ basic FE_DGQ elements where both the MPI exchange are more expensive and the
 operations done by FEFaceEvaluation::gather_evaluate() and
 FEFaceEvaluation::integrate_scatter().
 
-<table align="center" border="1">
+<table align="center" class="doxtable">
   <tr>
    <th>degree</th>
    <td>1</td>