From: David Wells Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 18:46:56 +0000 (-0500) Subject: Prefer 'MeshType' to 'Container' and 'GridClass'. X-Git-Tag: v8.4.0-rc2~61^2~1 X-Git-Url: https://gitweb.dealii.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=0d638bcc1c7b42094205741800a75b26c4b52ba1;p=dealii.git Prefer 'MeshType' to 'Container' and 'GridClass'. These things are already described as meshes in the documentation and there is already a class named Mesh (buried in grid_reordering_internal.h), so the best name for the concept is MeshType. --- diff --git a/doc/doxygen/headers/concepts.h b/doc/doxygen/headers/concepts.h index 01a94ad1db..86f13ba994 100644 --- a/doc/doxygen/headers/concepts.h +++ b/doc/doxygen/headers/concepts.h @@ -52,28 +52,6 @@ * *
* - *
@anchor ConceptContainerType ContainerType
- * - *
- - * There are several algorithms (e.g., - * GridTools::find_active_cell_around_point) in deal.II that can operate on - * either a Triangulation or a DoFHandler, as both classes may be considered - * to be collections of cells: see the @ref GlossMeshAsAContainer - * "glossary entry" for a further discussion of this idea. %Functions that may - * be called with either class indicate this by accepting a template parameter - * like - * @code - * template