From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@colostate.edu>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 22:18:58 +0000 (-0700)
Subject: Minor doc updates to the sparse direct solvers.
X-Git-Tag: relicensing~180^2
X-Git-Url: https://gitweb.dealii.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=14b3e66fa59045443b3a4011b5990ea379f2bae0;p=dealii.git

Minor doc updates to the sparse direct solvers.
---

diff --git a/include/deal.II/lac/petsc_solver.h b/include/deal.II/lac/petsc_solver.h
index 51ef469f69..ac95810089 100644
--- a/include/deal.II/lac/petsc_solver.h
+++ b/include/deal.II/lac/petsc_solver.h
@@ -934,12 +934,30 @@ namespace PETScWrappers
     solve(const MatrixBase &A, VectorBase &x, const VectorBase &b);
 
     /**
-     * The method allows to take advantage if the system matrix is symmetric
-     * by using LDL^T decomposition instead of more expensive LU. The argument
-     * indicates whether the matrix is symmetric or not.
+     * If called with `true` as argument, tell the direct solver
+     * to assume that the system matrix is symmetric.
+     * It does so by computing the LDL^T decomposition (in effect, a
+     * Cholesky decomposition) instead of more expensive LU decomposition.
+     * The argument indicates whether the matrix can be assumed to be
+     * symmetric or not.
+     *
+     * Note that most finite element matrices are "structurally symmetric",
+     * i.e., the *sparsity pattern* is symmetric, even though the matrix
+     * is not. An example of a matrix that is structurally symmetric
+     * but not symmetric is the matrix you obtain by discretizing the
+     * advection equation $\nabla \cdot (\vec\beta u) = f$ (see, for
+     * example step-12). Because the operator here is not symmetric, the
+     * matrix is not symmetric either; however, if matrix entry $A_{ij}$
+     * is nonzero, then matrix entry $A_{ji}$ is generally not zero either
+     * (and in any case, DoFTools::make_sparsity_pattern() will create a
+     * symmetric sparsity pattern). That said, the current function
+     * is not meant to indicate whether the *sparsity* pattern is symmetric,
+     * but whether the *matrix* itself is symmetric, and this typically
+     * requires that the differential operator you are considering is
+     * symmetric.
      */
     void
-    set_symmetric_mode(const bool flag);
+    set_symmetric_mode(const bool matrix_is_symmetric);
 
   protected:
     /**
diff --git a/include/deal.II/lac/sparse_direct.h b/include/deal.II/lac/sparse_direct.h
index 8cc8e200c7..ee3377723a 100644
--- a/include/deal.II/lac/sparse_direct.h
+++ b/include/deal.II/lac/sparse_direct.h
@@ -82,6 +82,11 @@ namespace types
  * SparseMatrix<float>, SparseMatrixEZ<float>, SparseMatrixEZ<double>,
  * BlockSparseMatrix<double>, and BlockSparseMatrix<float>.
  *
+ * This class is not instantiated for the matrix types in namespace
+ * PETScWrappers or TrilinosWrappers. However, PETScWrappers::SparseDirectMUMPS
+ * can be used for PETSc matrices, and in fact even works for parallel
+ * computations.
+ *
  * @ingroup Solvers Preconditioners
  */
 class SparseDirectUMFPACK : public Subscriptor
diff --git a/source/lac/petsc_solver.cc b/source/lac/petsc_solver.cc
index 3944a275cf..857dc9b951 100644
--- a/source/lac/petsc_solver.cc
+++ b/source/lac/petsc_solver.cc
@@ -812,9 +812,9 @@ namespace PETScWrappers
 
 
   void
-  SparseDirectMUMPS::set_symmetric_mode(const bool flag)
+  SparseDirectMUMPS::set_symmetric_mode(const bool matrix_is_symmetric)
   {
-    symmetric_mode = flag;
+    symmetric_mode = matrix_is_symmetric;
   }
 
 } // namespace PETScWrappers