From: wolf <wolf@0785d39b-7218-0410-832d-ea1e28bc413d>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 12:00:53 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: .
X-Git-Url: https://gitweb.dealii.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=3e38806781b665560a4ab9fc61d927d4697c5c1d;p=dealii-svn.git

.


git-svn-id: https://svn.dealii.org/trunk@5770 0785d39b-7218-0410-832d-ea1e28bc413d
---

diff --git a/deal.II/doc/tutorial/chapter-2.step-by-step/step-14.data/results.html b/deal.II/doc/tutorial/chapter-2.step-by-step/step-14.data/results.html
index ebb5ee88bb..ec9892fc88 100644
--- a/deal.II/doc/tutorial/chapter-2.step-by-step/step-14.data/results.html
+++ b/deal.II/doc/tutorial/chapter-2.step-by-step/step-14.data/results.html
@@ -200,7 +200,8 @@ criteria. To generate this data, simply change the value of the mesh
 refinement criterion variable in the main program. The results are
 thus (for the weight in the Kelly indicator, we have chosen the
 function <em>1/(r<sup>2</sup>+0.1<sup>2</sup>)</em>, where <em>r</em>
-is the distance to the evaluation point):
+is the distance to the evaluation point; it can be shown that this is
+the optimal weight if we neglect the effects of boundaries):
 </p>
 <p align="center">
  <a href="step-14.data/point_value/error-comparison.gif"