From: Ralf Hartmann Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 16:26:12 +0000 (+0000) Subject: Remove TODO. Numbering of patch->neighbors coincides with the new deal.II numbering... X-Git-Tag: v8.0.0~13630 X-Git-Url: https://gitweb.dealii.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=472a07911723c9276b5ad97154783e4dc851b868;p=dealii.git Remove TODO. Numbering of patch->neighbors coincides with the new deal.II numbering. Code will be simplified once the new numbering scheme is incorporated. git-svn-id: https://svn.dealii.org/trunk@10926 0785d39b-7218-0410-832d-ea1e28bc413d --- diff --git a/deal.II/deal.II/source/numerics/data_out.cc b/deal.II/deal.II/source/numerics/data_out.cc index a67e808e53..6c96915b97 100644 --- a/deal.II/deal.II/source/numerics/data_out.cc +++ b/deal.II/deal.II/source/numerics/data_out.cc @@ -518,8 +518,6 @@ void DataOut::build_some_patches (Data data) = this->patches[(*data.cell_to_patch_index_map) [neighbor->level()][neighbor->index()]].patch_index; -//TODO:[GK] Shouldn't we use the deal.II (i.e. the unnatural) numbering of the neighbors here as well rather than some new numbering scheme? - switch (dim) { case 1: