From: Wolfgang Bangerth Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 13:56:41 +0000 (-0600) Subject: Rewrite the introduction to the RT element. X-Git-Tag: v9.2.0-rc1~1034^2 X-Git-Url: https://gitweb.dealii.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=4b25b61fbf4a958473938e145cfa8436d2d4d669;p=dealii.git Rewrite the introduction to the RT element. --- diff --git a/include/deal.II/fe/fe_raviart_thomas.h b/include/deal.II/fe/fe_raviart_thomas.h index ea5371ad59..ec55acc860 100644 --- a/include/deal.II/fe/fe_raviart_thomas.h +++ b/include/deal.II/fe/fe_raviart_thomas.h @@ -35,13 +35,43 @@ DEAL_II_NAMESPACE_OPEN /*@{*/ /** - * Implementation of Raviart-Thomas (RT) elements, conforming with the space - * Hdiv. These elements generate vector fields with normal - * components continuous between mesh cells. + * Implementation of Raviart-Thomas (RT) elements. The Raviart-Thomas space + * is designed to solve problems in which the solution only lives in the + * space + * $H^\text{div}=\{ {\mathbf u} \in L_2: \text{div}\, {\mathbf u} \in L_2\}$, + * rather than in the more commonly used space + * $H^1=\{ u \in L_2: \nabla u \in L_2\}$. In other words, the solution must + * be a vector field whose divergence is square integrable, but for which the + * gradient may not be square integrable. The typical application for this + * space (and these elements) is to the mixed formulation of the Laplace + * equation and related situations, see for example step-20. The defining + * characteristic of functions in $H^\text{div}$ is that they are in + * general discontinuous -- but that if you draw a line in 2d (or a + * surface in 3d), then the normal component of the vector + * field must be continuous across the line (or surface) even though + * the tangential component may not be. As a consequence, the + * Raviart-Thomas element is constructed in such a way that (i) it is + * @ref vector_valued "vector-valued", (ii) the shape functions are + * discontinuous, but (iii) the normal component of the vector field + * represented by each shape function is continuous across the faces + * of cells. * - * We follow the usual definition of the degree of RT elements, which denotes - * the polynomial degree of the largest complete polynomial subspace contained - * in the RT space. Then, approximation order of the function itself is + * Other properties of the Raviart-Thomas element are that (i) it is + * @ref GlossPrimitive "not a primitive element"; (ii) the shape functions + * are defined so that certain integrals over the faces are either zero + * or one, rather than the common case of certain point values being + * either zero or one. (There is, however, the FE_RaviartThomasNodal + * element that uses point values.) + * + * We follow the commonly used -- though confusing -- definition of the "degree" + * of RT elements. Specifically, the "degree" of the element denotes + * the polynomial degree of the largest complete polynomial subspace + * contained in the finite element space, even if the space may contain shape + * functions of higher polynomial degree. The lowest order element is + * consequently FE_RaviartThomas(0), i.e., the Raviart-Thomas element "of + * degree zero", even though the functions of this space are in general + * polynomials of degree one in each variable. This choice of "degree" + * implies that the approximation order of the function itself is * degree+1, as with usual polynomial spaces. The numbering so chosen * implies the sequence * @f[ @@ -53,15 +83,10 @@ DEAL_II_NAMESPACE_OPEN * \stackrel{\text{div}}{\rightarrow} * DGQ_{k} * @f] - * The lowest order element is consequently FE_RaviartThomas(0). * * This class is not implemented for the codimension one case (spacedim != * dim). * - * @todo Even if this element is implemented for two and three space - * dimensions, the definition of the node values relies on consistently - * oriented faces in 3D. Therefore, care should be taken on complicated - * meshes. * *

Interpolation

*