From: bangerth <bangerth@0785d39b-7218-0410-832d-ea1e28bc413d>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 14:30:55 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: List changes for 6.2.1.
X-Git-Url: https://gitweb.dealii.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=5c8102d502688181aa3715fddfb3586beff55bd8;p=dealii-svn.git

List changes for 6.2.1.

git-svn-id: https://svn.dealii.org/branches/releases/Branch-6-2@18899 0785d39b-7218-0410-832d-ea1e28bc413d
---

diff --git a/deal.II/doc/doxygen/deal.dox b/deal.II/doc/doxygen/deal.dox
index dacf749177..be52685262 100644
--- a/deal.II/doc/doxygen/deal.dox
+++ b/deal.II/doc/doxygen/deal.dox
@@ -12,7 +12,8 @@ INPUT    = headers/ \
 	tutorial/doxygen \
 	../news/changes.h \
 	../news/6.0.0-vs-6.1.0.h \
-	../news/6.1.0-vs-6.2.0.h
+	../news/6.1.0-vs-6.2.0.h \
+	../news/6.2.0-vs-6.2.1.h
 
 HTML_OUTPUT      = deal.II
 LATEX_OUTPUT     = LaTeX/deal.II
diff --git a/deal.II/doc/news/6.2.0-vs-6.2.1.h b/deal.II/doc/news/6.2.0-vs-6.2.1.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..aabd3a6a27
--- /dev/null
+++ b/deal.II/doc/news/6.2.0-vs-6.2.1.h
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+/**
+ * @page changes_between_6.2.0_and_6.2.1 Changes between Version 6.2.0 and 6.2.1
+
+<p>
+This is the list of changes made between the release of 
+deal.II version 6.2.0 and version 6.2.1:
+</p>
+
+
+<ol>
+  <li>
+  <p>
+  A trivial mistake made deal.II unable to compile against any PETSc
+  version prior to 3.0.0. This is now fixed.
+  </p>
+  </li>
+
+  <li>
+  <p>
+  When running in parallel, the @ref step_18 "step-18" tutorial program
+  produced an error indicating that resetting user pointers was not
+  possible. This is now fixed.
+  </p>
+  </li>
+
+  <li>
+  <p>
+  The documentation tar-ball we provide for those who do not want to re-build
+  their own documentation locally using doxygen, did not include any typeset
+  formulas (an oversight: we used a machine without a latex installation to
+  build this package). The 6.2.1 package gets this right.
+  </p>
+  </li>
+
+  <li>
+  <p>
+  Some versions of gcc 3.3.x had a bug that showed with code recently introduced
+  into our sources in that it erroneously warned about perfectly legitimate
+  constructs. This is now fixed.
+  </p>
+  </li>
+</ol>
+
+
+*/