From: Wolfgang Bangerth Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2019 00:23:55 +0000 (-0700) Subject: Edit the introduction of step-61. X-Git-Tag: v9.1.0-rc1~221^2 X-Git-Url: https://gitweb.dealii.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=62ed359ab6aac96bb5aee6109e6f35dd6b37fa80;p=dealii.git Edit the introduction of step-61. --- diff --git a/examples/step-61/doc/intro.dox b/examples/step-61/doc/intro.dox index 5cc7c2120e..6d3ed92ed8 100644 --- a/examples/step-61/doc/intro.dox +++ b/examples/step-61/doc/intro.dox @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ formulation of the problem, for all test functions $q$, where @f{equation*} \mathcal{A}\left(p,q\right) - := \int_\Omega \mathbf{K} \nabla p \cdot \nabla q \;\mathrm{d}x, + := \int_\Omega \left(\mathbf{K} \nabla p\right) \cdot \nabla q \;\mathrm{d}x, @f} and @f{equation*} @@ -139,186 +139,330 @@ that is only defined in cell interiors. Consequently, for all discrete test functions $q_h$, where @f{equation*} \mathcal{A}_h\left(p_h,q_h\right) - := \sum_{T \in \mathcal{T}_h} - \int_T \mathbf{K} \nabla_{w,d} p_h \cdot \nabla_{w,d} q_h \;\mathrm{d}x, + := \sum_{K \in \mathbb{T}} + \int_K \mathbf{K} \nabla_{w,d} p_h \cdot \nabla_{w,d} q_h \;\mathrm{d}x, @f} and @f{equation*} \mathcal{F}\left(q_h\right) - := \sum_{T \in \mathcal{T}_h} \int_T f \, q_h^\circ \;\mathrm{d}x + := \sum_{K \in \mathbb{T}} \int_K f \, q_h^\circ \;\mathrm{d}x - \sum_{\gamma \in \Gamma_h^N} \int_\gamma u_N q_h^\partial \;\mathrm{d}x, @f} The key point is that here, we have replaced the gradient $\nabla p_h$ by the -discrete weak gradient - $ \nabla_{w,d} p_h $ that is defined for our peculiarly defined approximation $p_h$. -We use FE_DGQ as the interior polynomial space, -FE_FaceQ as the face polynomial space, and Raviart-Thomas elements for the velocity -$\mathbf{u} = -{\mathbf{K}} \nabla_{w,d} p$. +discrete weak gradient operator + $ \nabla_{w,d} p_h $ that makes sense for our peculiarly defined approximation $p_h$. + +The question is then how that operator works. For this, let us first say how we +think of the discrete approximation $p_h$ of the pressure. As mentioned above, +the "function" $p_h$ actually consists of two parts: the values $p_h^\circ$ in +the interior of cells, and $p_h^\partial$ on the interfaces. We have to define +discrete (finite-dimensional) function spaces for both of these; in this +program, we will use FE_DGQ for $p_h^\circ$ as the space in the interior of +cells (defined on each cell, but in general discontinuous along interfaces), +and FE_FaceQ for $p_h^\partial$ as the space on the interfaces. -

Assembling the linear system

+Then let us consider just a single cell (because the integrals above are all +defined cell-wise, and because the weak discrete gradient is defined cell-by-cell). +The restriction of $p_h$ to cell $K$, $p_h|_K$ then consists +of the pair $(p_h^\circ|_K,p_h^\partial|_{\partial K})$. In essence, we can +think of $\nabla_{w,d} p_h$ of some function defined on $K$ that approximates +the gradient; in particular, if $p_h|_K$ was the restriction of a differentiable +function (to the interior and boundary of $K$ -- which would make it continuous +between the interior and boundary), then +$\nabla_{w,d} p_h$ would simply be the exact gradient $\nabla p_h$. But, since +$p_h|_K$ is not continuous between interior and boundary of $K$, we need a more +general definition; furthermore, we can not deal with arbitrary functions, and +so require that $\nabla_{w,d} p_h$ is also in a finite element space (which, since +the gradient is a vector, has to be vector-valued). + +The way this is done is to define this weak gradient operator $\nabla_{w,d}|_K : +DGQ_k(K) \times DGQ_r(\partial K) \rightarrow RT_s(K)$ (where $RT_s(K)$ is the +vector-valued Raviart-Thomas space of order $s$ on cell $K$) in the following way: +@f{equation*}{ + \int_K \mathbf v_h \cdot (\nabla_{w,d} p_h) + = + -\int_K (\nabla \cdot \mathbf v_h) p_h^\circ + +\int_{\partial K} (\mathbf v_h \cdot \mathbf n) p_h^\partial, +@f} +for all test functions $\mathbf v_h \in RT_s(K)$. +This is, in essence, simply an application of the integration-by-parts +formula. In other words, for a given $p_h=(p^\circ_h,p^\partial_h)$, +we need to think of $\nabla_{w,d} p_h|_K$ as that +Raviart-Thomas function of degree $s$ for which the left hand side and right hand side +are equal for all test functions. + +@note It may be worth pointing out that while the weak discrete + gradient is an element of the Raviart-Thomas space $RT_s(K)$ on each + cell $K$, it is discontinuous between cells. On the other hand, the + Raviart-Thomas space $RT_s=RT_s({\mathbb T})$ defined on the entire + mesh and implemented by the FE_RaviartThomas class represents + functions that have continuous normal components at interfaces + between cells. This means that globally, $\nabla_{w,d} p_h$ + is not in $RT_s$, even though it is on every cell $K$ in $RT_s(K)$. + Rather, it is in a "broken" Raviart-Thomas space that below we will + represent by the symbol $DGRT_s$. (The term "broken" here refers to + the process of "breaking something apart", and not to the synonym to + the expression "not functional".) -First, we solve for the pressure. -We collect two local spaces together in one FESystem, -the first component in this finite element system denotes -the space for interior pressure, and the second denotes -the space for face pressure. -For the interior component, we use the polynomial space FE_DGQ. -For the face component, we use FE_FaceQ. - -We use shape functions defined on spaces FE_DGQ and FE_FaceQ to -approximate pressures, i.e., $p_h = \sum a_i \phi_i,$ -where $\phi_i$ are shape functions of FESystem. -We construct the local system by using discrete weak gradients of -shape functions of FE_DGQ and FE_FaceQ. -The discrete weak gradients of shape functions $\nabla_{w,d} \phi$ are defined as -$\nabla_{w,d} \phi = \sum_{i=1}^m c_i \mathbf{w}_i,$ -where $\mathbf{w}_i$ is the basis function of $RT(k)$. - -Using integration by parts, we have a small linear system -on each element $T$, + +

Representing the weak gradient

+ +Since $p_h$ is an element of a finite element space, we can expand it in a basis +as we always do, i.e., we can write +@f{equation*}{ + p_h(\mathbf x) = \sum_j P_j \varphi_j(\mathbf x). +@f} +Here, since $p_h$ has two components (the interior and the interface components), +the same must hold true for the basis functions $\varphi_j(\mathbf x)$, which we +can write as $\varphi_j = (\varphi_j^\circ,\varphi_j^\partial)$. If you've +followed the descriptions in step-8, step-20, and the +@ref vector_valued "documentation module on vector-valued problems", +it will be no surprise that for some values of $j$, $\varphi_j^\circ$ will be +zero, whereas for other values of $j$, $\varphi_j^\partial$ will be zero -- i.e., +shape functions will be of either one or the other kind. That is not important, +here, however. What is important is that we need to wonder how we can represent +$\nabla_{w,d} \varphi_j$ because that is clearly what will appear in the +problem when we want to implement the bilinear form @f{equation*} -\int_{T} \left(\nabla_{w,d} \phi \right) \cdot \mathbf{w} \mathrm{d}x= -\int_{T^\partial} \phi^{\partial} \left(\mathbf{w} \cdot \mathbf{n}\right) \mathrm{d}x- -\int_{T^\circ} \phi^{\circ} \left(\nabla \cdot \mathbf{w}\right) \mathrm{d}x, -\quad \forall \mathbf{w} \in RT_{[k]}(E), +\mathcal{A}_h\left(p_h,q_h\right) + = \sum_{K \in \mathbb{T}} + \int_K \mathbf{K} \nabla_{w,d} p_h \cdot \nabla_{w,d} q_h \;\mathrm{d}x, @f} +The key point is that $\nabla_{w,d} \varphi_j$ is known to be a member of the +"broken" Raviart-Thomas space $DGRT_s$. What this means is that we can +represent (on each cell $K$ separately) @f{equation*} -\sum_{i=1}^m c_i \int_T \mathbf{w}_i \cdot \mathbf{w}_j \mathrm{d}x = -\int_{T^{\partial}} \phi_i^{\partial} -\left(\mathbf{w}_j \cdot \mathbf{n} \right) \mathrm{d}x - -\int_{T^{\circ}} \phi_i^{\circ} \left (\nabla \cdot \mathbf{w}_j \right)\mathrm{d}x, +\nabla_{w,d} \varphi_j|_K + = \sum_k C_{jk}^K \mathbf v_k|_K @f} -which can be simplified to be -@f{equation*} -\mathbf{C}_{E}\mathbf{M}_{E} = \mathbf{F}_{E}, +where the functions $\mathbf v_k \in DGRT_s$, and where $C^K$ is a matrix of +dimension +@f{align*}{ + \text{dim}\left(DGQ_k(K) \times DGQ_r(K)\right) &\times \text{dim}\left(RT_s(K)\right) + \\ + &= + \left(\text{dim}(DGQ_k(K)) + \text{dim}(DGQ_r(K))\right) \times \text{dim}\left(RT_s(K)\right). @f} -where $\mathbf{C}_E$ is the matrix with unknown coefficients $c$, -$\mathbf{M}_E$ is the Gram matrix -$\left[ \int_T \mathbf{w}_i \cdot \mathbf{w}_j \right] \mathrm{d}x$, -$\mathbf{F}_E$ is the matrix of right hand side, -$\mathbf{w}$ and $\phi_i^{\circ}$ are in FEValues, -$\phi_i^{\partial}$ is in FEFaceValues. -Then we solve for $\mathbf{C}_E = \mathbf{F}_E \mathbf{M}_E^{-1}$. -Now, discrete weak gradients of shape functions are written as -linear combinations of basis functions of the $RT$ space. -In our code, we name $\mathbf{C}_E$ as cell_matrix_C, -$\mathbf{M}_E$ as cell_matrix_rt, -$\mathbf{F}_E$ as cell_matrix_F. - -The components of the local cell matrices $\mathbf{A}$ are -@f{equation*} -\mathbf{A}_{ij} = -\int_{T} \mathbf{K} \nabla_{w,d} \phi_i \cdot \nabla_{w,d} \phi_j \mathrm{d}x. +(That the weak discrete gradient can be represented as a matrix should not come +as a surprise: It is a linear operator from one finite dimensional +space to another finite dimensional space. If one chooses bases +for both of these spaces, then every linear operator can +of course be written as a matrix mapping the vector of expansion coefficients +with regards to the basis of the domain space of the operator, to +the vector of expansion coefficients with regards to the basis in the image +space.) + +Using this expansion, we can easily use the definition of the weak +discrete gradient above to define what the matrix is going to be: +@f{equation*}{ + \int_K \mathbf v_i \cdot \left(\sum_k C_{jk}^K \mathbf v_k\right) + = + -\int_K (\nabla \cdot \mathbf v_i) \varphi_j^\circ + +\int_{\partial K} (\mathbf v_i \cdot \mathbf n) \varphi_j^\partial, @f} -From previous steps, we know $\nabla_{w,d} \phi_i = \sum_{k=1}^m c_{ik} \mathbf{w}_k,$ -and $\nabla_{w,d} \phi_j = \sum_{l=1}^m c_{jl} \mathbf{w}_l.$ -Then combining the coefficients we have calculated, components of $\mathbf{A}$ are calculated as -@f{equation*} -\int_T \sum_{k,l = 1}^{m}c_{ik} c_{jl} \left(\mathbf{K} \mathbf{w}_i \cdot \mathbf{w}_j\right) \mathrm{d}x -= \sum_{k,l = 1}^{m}c_{ik} c_{jl} \int_{T} \mathbf{K} \mathbf{w}_i \cdot \mathbf{w}_j \mathrm{d}x. +for all test functions $\mathbf v_i \in DGRT_s$. + +This clearly leads to a linear system of the form +@f{equation*}{ + \sum_k M_{ik}^K C_{jk}^K + = + G_{ij}^K +@f} +with +@f{equation*}{ + M_{ik}^K = \int_K \mathbf v_i \cdot \mathbf v_k, + \qquad\qquad + G_{ij}^K = -\int_K (\nabla \cdot \mathbf v_i) \varphi_j^\circ + +\int_{\partial K} (\mathbf v_i \cdot \mathbf n) \varphi_j^\partial, +@f} +and consequently +@f{equation*}{ + \left(C^K\right)^T = \left(M^K\right)^{-1} G^K. @f} +(In this last step, we have assumed that the indices $i,j,k$ only range +over those degrees of freedom active on cell $K$, +thereby ensuring that the mass matrix on the space $RT_s(K)$ is invertible.) +Equivalently, using the symmetry of the matrix $M$, we have that +@f{equation*}{ + C^K = \left(G^K\right)^{T} \left(M^K\right)^{-1}. +@f} +Also worth pointing out is that the +matrices $C^K$ and $G^K$ are of course not square but rectangular. -Next, we use ConstraintMatrix::distribute_local_to_global to -distribute contributions from local matrices $\mathbf{A}$ to the system matrix. -In the scheme -$\mathcal{A}_h\left(p_h,q \right) = \mathcal{F} \left( q \right),$ -we have system matrix and system right hand side, -we can solve for the coefficients of the system matrix. -The solution vector of the scheme represents the pressure values in interiors and on faces. +

Assembling the linear system

+ +Having explained how the weak discrete gradient is defined, we can now +come back to the question of how the linear system for the equation in question +should be assembled. Specifically, using the definition of the bilinear +form ${\cal A}_h$ shown above, we then need to compute the elements of the +local contribution to the global matrix, +@f{equation*}{ + A^K_{ij} = \int_K \left({\mathbf K} \nabla_{w,d} \varphi_i\right) \cdot \nabla_{w,d} \varphi_j. +@f} +As explained above, we can expand $\nabla_{w,d} \varphi_i$ in terms of the +Raviart-Thomas basis on each cell, and similarly for $\nabla_{w,d} \varphi_j$: +@f{equation*}{ + A^K_{ij} = \int_K + \left( + {\mathbf K} + \sum_k C_{ik}^K \mathbf v_k|_K + \right) + \cdot + \sum_l C_{jl}^K \mathbf v_l|_K. +@f} +By re-arranging sums, this yields the following expression: +@f{equation*}{ + A^K_{ij} = + \sum_k \sum_l C_{ik}^K C_{jl}^K + \int_K + \left( + {\mathbf K} + \mathbf v_k|_K + \right) + \cdot + \mathbf v_l|_K. +@f} +So, if we have the matrix $C^K$ for each cell $K$, then we can easily compute +the contribution $A^K$ for cell $K$ to the matrix $A$ as follows: +@f{equation*}{ + A^K_{ij} = + \sum_k \sum_l C_{ik}^K C_{jl}^K + H^K_{kl} + = + \sum_k \sum_l C_{ik}^K H^K_{kl} C_{jl}^K + = + \left(C^K H^K (C^K)^T \right)_{ij}. +@f} +Here, +@f{equation*}{ + H^K_{kl} = + \int_K + \left( + {\mathbf K} + \mathbf v_k|_K + \right) + \cdot + \mathbf v_l|_K, +@f} +which is really just the mass matrix on cell $K$ using the Raviart-Thomas +basis and weighting by the permeability tensor $\mathbf K$. The derivation +here then shows that the weak Galerkin method really just requires us +to compute these $C^K$ and $H^K$ matrices on each cell $K$, and then +$A^K = C^K H^K (C^K)^T$, which is easily computed. The code to be shown +below does exactly this. + +Having so computed the contribution $A^K$ of cell $K$ to the global +matrix, all we have to do is to "distribute" these local contributions +into the global matrix. How this is done is first shown in step-3 and +step-4. In the current program, this will be facilitated by calling +AffineConstraints::distribute_local_to_global(). + +A linear system of course also needs a right hand side. There is no difficulty +associated with computing the right hand side here other than the fact +that we only need to use the cell-interior part $\varphi_i^\circ$ for +each shape function $\varphi_i$. +

Post-processing and $L_2$-errors

-After we have calculated the numerical pressure $p$, -we use discrete weak gradients of $p$ to calculate the velocity on each element. +The discussions in the previous sections have given us a linear +system that we can solve for the numerical pressure $p_h$. We can use +this to compute an approximation to the variable $\mathbf u = -{\mathbf K}\nabla p$ +that corresponds to the velocity with which the medium flows in a porous +medium if this is the model we are trying to solve. This kind of +step -- computing a derived quantity from the solution of the discrete +problem -- is typically called "post-processing". -On each element the gradient of the numerical pressure $\nabla p$ can be -approximated by discrete weak gradients $ \nabla_{w,d}\phi_i$, so +Here, instead of using the exact gradient of $p_h$, let us instead +use the discrete weak gradient of $p_h$ to calculate the velocity on each element. +As discussed above, +on each element the gradient of the numerical pressure $\nabla p$ can be +approximated by discrete weak gradients $ \nabla_{w,d}\phi_i$: @f{equation*} -\nabla_{w,d} p_h = \sum_{i} a_i \nabla_{w,d}\phi_i. +\nabla_{w,d} p_h += \nabla_{w,d} \left(\sum_{i} P_i \phi_i\right) += \sum_{i} P_i \nabla_{w,d}\phi_i. @f} -The numerical velocity $ \mathbf{u}_h = -\mathbf{K} \nabla_{w,d}p_h$ can be written as -@f{equation*} -\mathbf{u}_h = -\mathbf{K} \nabla_{w,d} p = --\sum_{i} \sum_{j} a_ic_{ij}\mathbf{K}\mathbf{w}_j, +On cell $K$, +the numerical velocity $ \mathbf{u}_h = -\mathbf{K} \nabla_{w,d}p_h$ can be written as +@f{align*}{ + \mathbf{u}_h + &= -\mathbf{K} \nabla_{w,d} p + = -\mathbf{K}\sum_{i} \sum_{j} P_i C^K_{ij}\mathbf{v}_j, @f} -where $c_{ij}$ is the coefficient of Gram matrix, -$\mathbf{w}_j$ is the basis function of the $RT$ space. -$\mathbf{K} \mathbf{w}_j$ may not be in the $RT$ space. -So we need $L_2$-projection to project it back to the $RT$ space. +where $C^K$ is the expansion matrix from above, and +$\mathbf{v}_j$ is the basis function of the $RT$ space on a cell. + +Unfortunately, $\mathbf{K} \mathbf{v}_j$ may not be in the $RT$ space +(unless, of course, if $\mathbf K$ is constant times the identity matrix). +So, in order to represent it in a finite element program, we need to +project it back into a finite dimensional space we can work with. Here, +we we will use the $L_2$-projection to project it back to the (broken) $RT$ +space. We define the projection as -$ \mathbf{Q}_h \left( \mathbf{K}\mathbf{w}_j \right) = -\sum_{k} d_{jk}\mathbf{w}_k$. +$ \mathbf{Q}_h \left( \mathbf{K}\mathbf{v}_j \right) = +\sum_{k} d_{jk}\mathbf{v}_k$ on each cell $K$. For any $j$, -$\left( \mathbf{Q}_h \left( \mathbf{Kw}_j \right),\mathbf{w}_k \right)_E = -\left( \mathbf{Kw}_j,\mathbf{w}_k \right)_E.$ -So the numerical velocity becomes +$\left( \mathbf{Q}_h \left( \mathbf{Kv}_j \right),\mathbf{v}_k \right)_K = +\left( \mathbf{Kv}_j,\mathbf{v}_k \right)_K.$ +So, rather than the formula shown above, the numerical velocity on cell $K$ +instead becomes @f{equation*} \mathbf{u}_h = \mathbf{Q}_h \left( -\mathbf{K}\nabla_{w,d}p_h \right) = --\sum_{i=0}^{4} \sum_{j=1}^{4}a_ib_{ij}\mathbf{Q}_h \left( \mathbf{K}\mathbf{w}_j \right), +-\sum_i \sum_j P_i B^K_{ij}\mathbf{Q}_h \left( \mathbf{K}\mathbf{v}_j \right), @f} -and we have the following system to solve for the coefficients $d_{jk}$, +and we have the following system to solve for the coefficients $d_{jk}$: @f{equation*} - \left[ - \begin{matrix} - \left(\mathbf{w}_i,\mathbf{w}_j \right) - \end{matrix} - \right] - \left[ - \begin{matrix} + \sum_j + \left(\mathbf{v}_i,\mathbf{v}_j\right) d_{jk} - \end{matrix} - \right] = - \left[ - \begin{matrix} - \left( \mathbf{Kw}_j,\mathbf{w}_k \right) - \end{matrix} - \right]. + \left( \mathbf{Kv}_j,\mathbf{v}_k \right). @f} +In the implementation below, the matrix with elements $ - \left[ - \begin{matrix} d_{jk} - \end{matrix} - \right] $ -is named cell_matrix_D, +is called cell_matrix_D, +whereas the matrix with elements $ -\left[ - \begin{matrix} - \left( \mathbf{Kw}_j,\mathbf{w}_k \right) - \end{matrix} - \right] + \left( \mathbf{Kv}_j,\mathbf{v}_k \right) $ -is named cell_matrix_E. +is called cell_matrix_E. Then the elementwise velocity is @f{equation*} -\mathbf{u}_h = -\sum_{i} \sum_{j}a_ic_{ij}\sum_{k}d_{jk}\mathbf{w}_k = -\sum_{k}- \left(\sum_{j} \sum_{i} a_ic_{ij}d_{jk} \right)\mathbf{w}_k, +\mathbf{u}_h = -\sum_{i} \sum_{j}P_ic_{ij}\sum_{k}d_{jk}\mathbf{v}_k = +\sum_{k}- \left(\sum_{j} \sum_{i} P_ic_{ij}d_{jk} \right)\mathbf{v}_k, @f} -where $-\sum_{j} \sum_{i} a_ic_{ij}d_{jk}$ is named +where $-\sum_{j} \sum_{i} P_ic_{ij}d_{jk}$ is called beta in the code. -We calculate the $L_2$-errors of pressure, velocity and flux -by the following formulas, +Using this velocity obtained by "postprocessing" the solution, we can +define the $L_2$-errors of pressure, velocity, and flux +by the following formulas: @f{eqnarray*} \|p-p_h^\circ\|^2 - = \sum_{T \in \mathcal{T}_h} \|p-p_h^\circ\|_{L^2(E)}^2, \\ + = \sum_{K \in \mathbb{T}} \|p-p_h^\circ\|_{L_2(K)}^2, \\ \|\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{u}_h\|^2 - = \sum_{T \in \mathcal{T}_h} \|\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{u}_h\|_{L^2(E)^2}^2,\\ + = \sum_{K \in \mathbb{T}} \|\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{u}_h\|_{L_2(K)^2}^d,\\ \|(\mathbf{u}-\mathbf{u}_h) \cdot \mathbf{n}\|^2 - = \sum_{T \in \mathcal{T}_h} \sum_{\gamma \subset T^\partial} - \frac{|T|}{|\gamma|} \|\mathbf{u} \cdot \mathbf{n} - \mathbf{u}_h \cdot \mathbf{n}\|_{L^2(\gamma)}^2, + = \sum_{K \in \mathbb{T}} \sum_{\gamma \subset \partial K} + \frac{|K|}{|\gamma|} \|\mathbf{u} \cdot \mathbf{n} - \mathbf{u}_h \cdot \mathbf{n}\|_{L_2(\gamma)}^2, @f} -where $| T |$ is the area of the element, +where $| K |$ is the area of the element, $\gamma$ are faces of the element, -$\mathbf{n}$ are unit normal vectors of each face. +$\mathbf{n}$ are unit normal vectors of each face. The last of these +norms measures the accuracy of the normal component of the velocity +vectors over the interfaces between the cells of the mesh. The scaling +factor $|K|/|\gamma|$ is chosen so as to scale out the difference in +the length (or area) of the collection of interfaces as the mesh size +changes. -We will extract interior pressure solutions of each cell -from the global solution and calculate the $L_2$ error -by using function VectorTools::integrate_difference. +The first of these errors above is easily computed using +VectorTools::integrate_difference. The others require a bit more work +and are implemented in the code below.