From: Matthias Maier <tamiko@43-1.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 10:48:53 +0000 (-0600)
Subject: fix a rendering issue with doxygen 1.9.3
X-Git-Tag: v9.4.0-rc1~566^2
X-Git-Url: https://gitweb.dealii.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=678d1f3befa68157a8e525e2a5e2f9365f5c7cc1;p=dealii.git

fix a rendering issue with doxygen 1.9.3
---

diff --git a/examples/step-69/doc/intro.dox b/examples/step-69/doc/intro.dox
index 27f73a166b..ddcfa08b13 100644
--- a/examples/step-69/doc/intro.dox
+++ b/examples/step-69/doc/intro.dox
@@ -254,8 +254,8 @@ advance the solution. This leaves very little reason to use vector-valued
 finite element spaces both in theory and/or practice.
 
 We will use the usual Lagrange finite elements: let $\{\mathbf{x}_i\}_{i \in
-\mathcal{V}}$ denote the set of all support points (see @ref GlossSupport "this
-glossary entry"), where $\mathbf{x}_i \in \mathbb{R}^d$. Then each index $i \in
+\mathcal{V}}$ denote the set of all support points (see @ref GlossSupport "this glossary entry"),
+where $\mathbf{x}_i \in \mathbb{R}^d$. Then each index $i \in
 \mathcal{V}$ uniquely identifies a support point $\mathbf{x}_i$, as well as a
 scalar-valued shape function $\phi_i$. With this notation at hand we can define
 the (explicit time stepping) scheme as: