From: Alexander Grayver Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2020 07:38:14 +0000 (+0100) Subject: Add changelog X-Git-Tag: v9.2.0-rc1~379^2 X-Git-Url: https://gitweb.dealii.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=6ba893403e1a3ad669cdeb6f1fbe295afc86f51a;p=dealii.git Add changelog --- diff --git a/doc/news/changes/minor/20200320Grayver b/doc/news/changes/minor/20200320Grayver new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..c551586060 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/news/changes/minor/20200320Grayver @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +Added high-order mesh output to the step-11 tutorial. +
+(Alexander Grayver, 2020/03/20) diff --git a/examples/step-11/doc/results.dox b/examples/step-11/doc/results.dox index ec32c39377..d9bf0706fe 100644 --- a/examples/step-11/doc/results.dox +++ b/examples/step-11/doc/results.dox @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ order. On the other hand, using a cubic mapping only improves the result further insignificantly, except for the case of very coarse grids. -We can also visualize the underlying meshes by using, for instance +We can also visualize the underlying meshes by using, for instance, ParaView. The image below shows initial meshes for different mapping degrees: @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ degrees: Clearly, the effect is most pronounced when we go from the linear to quadratic mapping. This is also reflected in the error values given in the table above. The effect of going from quadratic to cubic degree -is less dramatic, but still tangible owning to a more accurace +is less dramatic, but still tangible owing to a more accurate description of the circular boundary. Next, let's look at the meshes after three global refinements @@ -61,5 +61,5 @@ Next, let's look at the meshes after three global refinements Here, the differences are much less visible, especially for higher order mappings. Indeed, at this refinement level the error values reported -in the table are essentially identical between mappings of degree two +in the table are essentially identical between mappings of degrees two and three.