From: Wolfgang Bangerth Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:34:17 +0000 (+0000) Subject: Fix a typo in the description of the boundary conditions found by Chih-Che Chueh... X-Git-Tag: v8.0.0~9222 X-Git-Url: https://gitweb.dealii.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=98ae02dd8232e4b8891d920449390160f3cf510a;p=dealii.git Fix a typo in the description of the boundary conditions found by Chih-Che Chueh . git-svn-id: https://svn.dealii.org/trunk@15990 0785d39b-7218-0410-832d-ea1e28bc413d --- diff --git a/deal.II/examples/step-21/doc/intro.dox b/deal.II/examples/step-21/doc/intro.dox index 43a928a54a..a5a7f9ec7f 100644 --- a/deal.II/examples/step-21/doc/intro.dox +++ b/deal.II/examples/step-21/doc/intro.dox @@ -426,9 +426,9 @@ boundary conditions for the saturation on the inflow part of the boundary, @f] On this inflow boundary, we impose the following saturation values: @f{eqnarray} - S(\mathbf{x},t) = 1 & \textrm{on}\ \Gamma_{in}\cap\{x_1=1\}, + S(\mathbf{x},t) = 1 & \textrm{on}\ \Gamma_{in}\cap\{x_1=0\}, \\ - S(\mathbf{x},t) = 0 & \textrm{on}\ \Gamma_{in}\backslash \{x_1=1\}. + S(\mathbf{x},t) = 0 & \textrm{on}\ \Gamma_{in}\backslash \{x_1=0\}. @f} In other words, we have pure water entering the reservoir at the left, whereas the other parts of the boundary are in contact with undisturbed parts of the