From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@math.tamu.edu>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:57:40 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: Fix awkward wording.
X-Git-Tag: v8.0.0~4095
X-Git-Url: https://gitweb.dealii.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=a5c4f39932f5517cb468b79b59c3eb691f53afad;p=dealii.git

Fix awkward wording.


git-svn-id: https://svn.dealii.org/trunk@23663 0785d39b-7218-0410-832d-ea1e28bc413d
---

diff --git a/deal.II/examples/step-46/doc/results.dox b/deal.II/examples/step-46/doc/results.dox
index e96291f8c8..701fbf7755 100644
--- a/deal.II/examples/step-46/doc/results.dox
+++ b/deal.II/examples/step-46/doc/results.dox
@@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ would be a good preconditioner if $\widetilde{A_{\text{fluid}}^{-1}}
 \approx A_{\text{solid}}^{-1}$.
 
 That means, we only need good preconditioners for Stokes and the
-elasticity equations separately. These are well known, however: for
+elasticity equations separately. These are well known: for
 Stokes, we can use the preconditioner discussed in the results section
 of step-22; for elasticity, a good preconditioner would be a single
 V-cycle of a geometric or algebraic multigrid. There are more open