From: hartmann Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 07:34:39 +0000 (+0000) Subject: Small fix. X-Git-Url: https://gitweb.dealii.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=bb6ad166a7b5502e2cdb34700715267e0a0cc39d;p=dealii-svn.git Small fix. git-svn-id: https://svn.dealii.org/trunk@9068 0785d39b-7218-0410-832d-ea1e28bc413d --- diff --git a/deal.II/doc/tutorial/chapter-2.step-by-step/step-14.data/results.html b/deal.II/doc/tutorial/chapter-2.step-by-step/step-14.data/results.html index a6983fbffd..85d13aedd1 100644 --- a/deal.II/doc/tutorial/chapter-2.step-by-step/step-14.data/results.html +++ b/deal.II/doc/tutorial/chapter-2.step-by-step/step-14.data/results.html @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ The program prints the point value and the estimated error in this quantity. From extrapolating it, we can guess that the exact value is somewhat like 0.0334473, plus or minus 0.0000001 (note that we get almost 6 valid digits from only 22,000 (primal) degrees of -freedom. This number cannot be obtaint from the value of the +freedom. This number cannot be obtained from the value of the functional alone, but I have used the assumption that the error estimator is mostly exact, and extrapolated the computed value plus the estimated error, to get an approximation of the true diff --git a/deal.II/doc/tutorial/chapter-2.step-by-step/step-15.data/intro.html b/deal.II/doc/tutorial/chapter-2.step-by-step/step-15.data/intro.html index f35bfbe7a6..7abd38213e 100644 --- a/deal.II/doc/tutorial/chapter-2.step-by-step/step-15.data/intro.html +++ b/deal.II/doc/tutorial/chapter-2.step-by-step/step-15.data/intro.html @@ -496,7 +496,7 @@ case at diff --git a/deal.II/doc/tutorial/chapter-2.step-by-step/step-15.data/intro.tex b/deal.II/doc/tutorial/chapter-2.step-by-step/step-15.data/intro.tex index 6d90c2ac7a..4d712e5f54 100644 --- a/deal.II/doc/tutorial/chapter-2.step-by-step/step-15.data/intro.tex +++ b/deal.II/doc/tutorial/chapter-2.step-by-step/step-15.data/intro.tex @@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ Note that this equation degenerates wherever $u^3=x$, which is at least the case at $x\in\{0,1\}$ due to the prescribed boundary values for $u$, but possibly at other places as well. However, for finite elements, we will want to have the equation in weak form anyway. Since the equation is still -nonlinear, one may be tempted to we compute iterates +nonlinear, one may be tempted to compute iterates $u_{k+1}=u_k+\alpha_k\delta u_k$ using a Newton method for updates $\delta u_k$, like in \begin{equation*}