From: David Wells Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2016 22:01:23 +0000 (-0400) Subject: Improve the word order in a dependent clause. X-Git-Tag: v8.5.0-rc1~985^2~1 X-Git-Url: https://gitweb.dealii.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=be869c7f4b389ab7640ceb1e5b21436179cdea76;p=dealii.git Improve the word order in a dependent clause. --- diff --git a/examples/step-22/doc/intro.dox b/examples/step-22/doc/intro.dox index 91efc89a92..b795f8a79c 100644 --- a/examples/step-22/doc/intro.dox +++ b/examples/step-22/doc/intro.dox @@ -564,8 +564,8 @@ matrix. It is therefore an operation that can efficiently also be computed in represent an exact inverse of the matrix $A$. Consequently, preconditioning with the ILU will still require more than one iteration, unlike preconditioning with the sparse direct solver. The inner solver will therefore -take more time when multiplying with the Schur complement, a trade-off -unavoidable. +take more time when multiplying with the Schur complement: an unavoidable +trade-off. In the program below, we will make use of the fact that the SparseILU and