From: bangerth Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 08:17:55 +0000 (+0000) Subject: Clarify where the output is from. X-Git-Url: https://gitweb.dealii.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=e6dff42bb4a5b7af575bff124a707f0473bc9c21;p=dealii-svn.git Clarify where the output is from. git-svn-id: https://svn.dealii.org/trunk@25155 0785d39b-7218-0410-832d-ea1e28bc413d --- diff --git a/deal.II/examples/step-44/doc/results.dox b/deal.II/examples/step-44/doc/results.dox index fa85da50a5..a26bdc8ed6 100644 --- a/deal.II/examples/step-44/doc/results.dox +++ b/deal.II/examples/step-44/doc/results.dox @@ -19,7 +19,11 @@ Firstly, a comparison of a batch of results with that in the literature demonstr Using the appropriate material and loading parameters, a set of results matches that presented in Reese (2000) is produced. Both schemes demonstrate good convergence properties upon grid refinement, with an accurate measure of the centre-point vertical displacement attained within a few grid refinements. The lower order formulation typically overestimates the displacement solution at low levels of refinement, while the higher order interpolation scheme underestimates it, but be a lesser degree. This result gives confidence that the program produces the correct output. -A typical output generated by running the problem looks is shown below. The particular case demonstrated is that of the Q2-P1-P1 element. +A typical output generated by running the problem looks is shown below +(with one more global mesh refinement than the version of the program +that can be found in the examples/step-44 directory where +we want to keep run times more moderate). The particular case +demonstrated is that of the Q2-P1-P1 element. @code Grid: