From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@math.tamu.edu>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 22:14:54 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: Comment on the testcase shown.
X-Git-Tag: v8.0.0~7275
X-Git-Url: https://gitweb.dealii.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=e770094448171d4ce22bb9e6e421e1756a61bd0f;p=dealii.git

Comment on the testcase shown.


git-svn-id: https://svn.dealii.org/trunk@19293 0785d39b-7218-0410-832d-ea1e28bc413d
---

diff --git a/deal.II/examples/step-32/doc/results.dox b/deal.II/examples/step-32/doc/results.dox
index 4eee905446..6b0ac96e88 100644
--- a/deal.II/examples/step-32/doc/results.dox
+++ b/deal.II/examples/step-32/doc/results.dox
@@ -1,9 +1,15 @@
 <h1>Results</h1>
 
 When run, the program simulates convection in 3d in much the same way
-as @ref step_31 "step-31" did -- in fact, the testcase is exactly the
-same, just that we can now solve in parallel and with much higher
-resolution.
+as @ref step_31 "step-31" did, though with an entirely different testcase. 
+
+
+<h3>Comparison of results with step-31</h3>
+
+Before we go to this testcase, however, let us show a few results from a
+slightly earlier version of this program that was solving exactly the
+testcase we used in step-31, just that we now solve it in parallel and with
+much higher resolution. We show these results mainly for comparison.
 
 Here are two images that show this higher resolution if we choose a 3d
 computation in <code>main()</code> and if we set
@@ -29,6 +35,10 @@ magnitude more than we had available in step-31:
 The computation was done on a subset of 50 processors of the Brazos
 cluster at Texas A&amp;M University.
 
+
+<h3>Results for a 2d circular shell testcase</h3>
+
+
 For a much more modest run (less mesh refinement, only 35 time steps, but 50
 processors as above), we get this as output: