From: Martin Kronbichler Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 08:38:59 +0000 (+0100) Subject: Document option for inhomogeneity in MatrixFreeOperators::Base. X-Git-Tag: v9.0.0-rc1~844^2 X-Git-Url: https://gitweb.dealii.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=refs%2Fpull%2F5357%2Fhead;p=dealii.git Document option for inhomogeneity in MatrixFreeOperators::Base. --- diff --git a/include/deal.II/matrix_free/operators.h b/include/deal.II/matrix_free/operators.h index cc65ed759c..fb95b2c8d3 100644 --- a/include/deal.II/matrix_free/operators.h +++ b/include/deal.II/matrix_free/operators.h @@ -124,13 +124,30 @@ namespace MatrixFreeOperators * of the blocks in the underlying MatrixFree object by optional integer * lists that specify the chosen blocks. * - * One application of selection is in problems with a Newton-type iteration + * One application of constructing a matrix-free operator only on selected + * blocks would be the setting of the step-32 tutorial program: This + * problem has three blocks, one for the velocity, one for the + * pressure, and one for temperature. The time lag scheme used for temporal + * evolution splits the temperature equation away from the Stokes system in + * velocity and pressure. However, there are cross terms like the velocity + * that enters the temperature advection-diffusion equation or the + * temperature that enters the right hand side of the velocity. In order to + * be sure that MatrixFree uses the same integer indexing to the different + * blocks, one needs to put all the three blocks into the same MatrixFree + * object. However, when solving a linear system the operators involved + * either address the first two in the Stokes solver, or the last one for + * the temperature solver. In the former case, a BlockVector of two + * components would be selected with a vector selecting the blocks {0, 1} in + * MatrixFree, whereas in the latter, a non-block vector selecting the block + * {2} would be used. + * + * A second application of selection is in problems with a Newton-type iteration * or problems with inhomogeneous boundary conditions. In such a case, one * has to deal with two different sets of constraints: One set of * constraints applies to the solution vector which might include hanging * node constraints or periodicity constraints but no constraints on * inhomogeneous Dirichlet boundaries. Before the nonlinear iteration, the - * boundary values are set to the expected value in the vector representing + * boundary values are set to the expected value in the vector, representing * the initial guess. In each iteration of the Newton method, a linear * system subject to zero Dirichlet boundary conditions is solved that is * then added to the initial guess. This setup can be realized by using a @@ -141,22 +158,26 @@ namespace MatrixFreeOperators * function, i.e., a vector of length 1 that selects exactly the first * constraint matrix with index 0. * - * A second application of using selectively constructing a matrix-free - * operator would be the setting of the step-32 tutorial program: This - * problem has three blocks, one for the velocity, one for the - * pressure, and one for temperature. The time lag scheme used for temporal - * evolution splits the temperature equation away from the Stokes system in - * velocity and pressure. However, there are cross terms like the velocity - * that enters the temperature advection-diffusion equation or the - * temperature that enters the right hand side of the velocity. In order to - * be sure that MatrixFree uses the same integer indexing to the different - * blocks, one needs to put all three blocks into the same MatrixFree - * object. However, when solving a linear system the operators involved - * either address the first two in the Stokes solver, or the last one for - * the temperature solver. In the former case, a BlockVector of two - * components would be selected with a vector selecting the blocks {0, 1} in - * MatrixFree, whereas in the latter, a non-block vector selecting the block - * {2} would be used. + * For systems of PDEs where the different blocks of MatrixFree are + * associated with different physical components of the equations, adding + * another block with a different ConstraintMatrix argument solely for the + * purpose of boundary conditions might lead to cumbersome index + * handling. Instead, one could set up a second MatrixFree instance with the + * different constraint matrix but the same interpretation of blocks, and + * use that for interpolating inhomogeneous boundary conditions (see also + * the discussion in the results section of the step-37 tutorial program): + * + * @code + * matrix_free_inhomogeneous.reinit(dof_handler, constraints_no_dirichlet, + * quadrature, additional_data); + * operator_inhomogeneous.initialize(matrix_free_inhomogeneous, selected_blocks); + * LinearAlgebra::distributed::Vector inhomogeneity; + * matrix_free_inhomogeneous.initialize_dof_vector(inhomogeneity); + * constraints_with_dirichlet.distribute(inhomogeneity); + * operator_inhomogeneous.vmult(system_rhs, inhomogeneity); + * system_rhs *= -1.; + * // proceed with other terms from right hand side... + * @endcode * * @author Denis Davydov, Daniel Arndt, Martin Kronbichler, 2016, 2017 */