From: Wolfgang Bangerth Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 21:43:17 +0000 (-0600) Subject: Simplify the code a bit. X-Git-Tag: v9.2.0-rc1~393^2 X-Git-Url: https://gitweb.dealii.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=refs%2Fpull%2F9697%2Fhead;p=dealii.git Simplify the code a bit. Also provide a better explanation of a '(void)var;' statement. --- diff --git a/examples/step-20/step-20.cc b/examples/step-20/step-20.cc index 80a09717db..a629c3b5aa 100644 --- a/examples/step-20/step-20.cc +++ b/examples/step-20/step-20.cc @@ -253,28 +253,38 @@ namespace Step20 // check to the beginning of the class to make sure that the sizes of input // and output parameters are the same (see step-5 for a discussion of this // technique). Then we loop over all evaluation points, and for each one - // first clear the output tensor and then set all its diagonal elements to - // one (i.e. fill the tensor with the identity matrix): + // set the output tensor to the identity matrix. + // + // There is an oddity at the top of the function (the + // `(void)points;` statement) that is worth discussing. The values + // we put into the output `values` array does not actually depend + // on the `points` arrays of coordinates at which the function is + // evaluated. In other words, the `points` argument is in fact + // unused, and we could have just not given it a name if we had + // wanted. But we want to use the `points` object for checking + // that the `values` object has the correct size. The problem is + // that in release mode, `AssertDimension` is defined as a macro + // that expands to nothing; the compiler will then complain that + // the `points` object is unused. The idiomatic approach to + // silencing this warning is to have a statement that evaluates + // (reads) variable but doesn't actually do anything: That's what + // `(void)points;` does: It reads from `points`, and then casts + // the result of the read to `void`, i.e., nothing. This statement + // is, in other words, completely pointless and implies no actual + // action except to explain to the compiler that yes, this + // variable is in fact used even in release mode. (In debug mode, + // the `AssertDimension` macro expands to something that reads + // from the variable, and so the funny statement would not be + // necessary in debug mode.) template void KInverse::value_list(const std::vector> &points, std::vector> & values) const { - // The value we are going to store for a given point does not depend on - // its coordinates, and we use the `points` object only for checking that - // the `values` object has the correct size. In release mode, - // `AssertDimension` is defined empty, and the compiler will complain that - // the `points` object is unused. The following line silences this - // warning. (void)points; AssertDimension(points.size(), values.size()); for (auto &value : values) - { - value.clear(); - - for (unsigned int d = 0; d < dim; ++d) - value[d][d] = 1.; - } + value = unit_symmetric_tensor(); } } // namespace PrescribedSolution