From 0b1e17448b99058a24d6d71336c24bca68606292 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: kronbichler Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 19:14:49 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Fix sentence git-svn-id: https://svn.dealii.org/trunk@31425 0785d39b-7218-0410-832d-ea1e28bc413d --- deal.II/examples/step-51/doc/results.dox | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/deal.II/examples/step-51/doc/results.dox b/deal.II/examples/step-51/doc/results.dox index 198cd70344..25db8378b4 100644 --- a/deal.II/examples/step-51/doc/results.dox +++ b/deal.II/examples/step-51/doc/results.dox @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ One can see the error reduction upon grid refinement, and for the cases where global refinement was performed, also the convergence rates. The quadratic convergence rates of Q1 elements in the $L_2$ norm for both the scalar variable and the gradient variable is apparent, as is the cubic rate for the -postprocessed scalar variable in the $L_2$ norm. Note that is is a distinctive +postprocessed scalar variable in the $L_2$ norm. Note this distinctive feature of an HDG solution. In typical continuous finite elements, the gradient of the solution of order p converges at rate p only, as opposed to p+1 for the actual solution. Even though superconvergence -- 2.39.5