From 3b534c9a7c18156a4bd2259b75086dadd20dd110 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Timo Heister Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 18:06:23 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] fix error in latex formula eqnarray can not have more than two &s. --- examples/step-51/doc/intro.dox | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/examples/step-51/doc/intro.dox b/examples/step-51/doc/intro.dox index a2b5600847..0bca1036c4 100644 --- a/examples/step-51/doc/intro.dox +++ b/examples/step-51/doc/intro.dox @@ -190,25 +190,25 @@ component of the numerical flux, and integrating by parts on the equation weighted by $w$, we arrive at the final form of the problem: Find $(\mathbf{q}_h, u_h, \hat{u}_h) \in \mathcal{V}_h^p \times \mathcal{W}_h^p \times \mathcal{M}_h^p$ such that -@f{eqnarray*} +@f{align*} (\mathbf{v}, \kappa^{-1} \mathbf{q}_h)_{\mathcal{T}} - ( \nabla\cdot\mathbf{v}, u_h)_{\mathcal{T}} + \left<\mathbf{v}\cdot\mathbf{n}, \hat{u}_h\right>_{\partial\mathcal{T}} - &=& 0, + &= 0, \quad &&\forall \mathbf{v} \in \mathcal{V}_h^p, \\ - (\nabla w, \mathbf{c} u_h)_{\mathcal{T}} + (w, \nabla \cdot \mathbf{q}_h)_{\mathcal{T}} + (w, (\mathbf{c}\cdot\mathbf{n}) \hat{u}_H)_{\partial \mathcal{T}} + \left_{\partial \mathcal{T}} - &=& + &= (w, f)_{\mathcal{T}}, \quad &&\forall w \in \mathcal{W}_h^p, \\ \left< \mu, \hat{u}_h\mathbf{c} \cdot \mathbf{n} + \mathbf{q}_h\cdot \mathbf{n} + \tau (u_h - \hat{u}_h)\right>_{\partial \mathcal{T}} - &=& + &= \left<\mu, g_N\right>_{\partial\Omega_N}, \quad &&\forall \mu \in \mathcal{M}_h^p. @f} -- 2.39.5