From 4f734fcb244567b75e6420ca3c631c4ceec13fd7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Wolfgang Bangerth Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2021 16:10:54 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Add references to step-47. --- examples/step-47/doc/results.dox | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/examples/step-47/doc/results.dox b/examples/step-47/doc/results.dox index bfae9425db..a5864e9fec 100644 --- a/examples/step-47/doc/results.dox +++ b/examples/step-47/doc/results.dox @@ -24,7 +24,8 @@ $\gamma = 1$, $2$, are too small; on the other hand, a value $p(p+1)$ would be reasonable, where $p$ is the degree of polynomials. The last of these choices is the one one would expect to work by comparing -to the discontinuous Galerkin formulations for the Laplace equation, +to the discontinuous Galerkin formulations for the Laplace equation +(see, for example, the discussions in step-39 and step-74), and it will turn out to also work here. But we should check what value of $\gamma$ is right, and we will do so below; changing $\gamma$ is easy in the two `face_worker` and -- 2.39.5