From 5630e01165bf0711a808a4929d36592519d67921 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: wolf Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 15:55:15 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Fix overly conservative choice of quadrature formula. Fix comment. git-svn-id: https://svn.dealii.org/trunk@8005 0785d39b-7218-0410-832d-ea1e28bc413d --- deal.II/examples/step-14/step-14.cc | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/deal.II/examples/step-14/step-14.cc b/deal.II/examples/step-14/step-14.cc index 3bd1efa41f..f587722e4b 100644 --- a/deal.II/examples/step-14/step-14.cc +++ b/deal.II/examples/step-14/step-14.cc @@ -1963,7 +1963,7 @@ namespace DualFunctional } - // @sect4{The PointValueEvaluation class} + // @sect4{The PointXDerivativeEvaluation class} // As second application, we again // consider the evaluation of the @@ -3831,8 +3831,8 @@ void Framework::run (const ProblemDescription &descriptor) // formula: const FE_Q primal_fe(descriptor.primal_fe_degree); const FE_Q dual_fe(descriptor.dual_fe_degree); - const QGauss quadrature(2*descriptor.dual_fe_degree+1); - const QGauss face_quadrature(2*descriptor.dual_fe_degree+1); + const QGauss quadrature(descriptor.dual_fe_degree+1); + const QGauss face_quadrature(descriptor.dual_fe_degree+1); // Next, select one of the classes // implementing different -- 2.39.5