From 5a4e7cb3c6f030669bcd11038681189896ea80e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: bangerth Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 22:14:54 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Comment on the testcase shown. git-svn-id: https://svn.dealii.org/trunk@19293 0785d39b-7218-0410-832d-ea1e28bc413d --- deal.II/examples/step-32/doc/results.dox | 16 +++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/deal.II/examples/step-32/doc/results.dox b/deal.II/examples/step-32/doc/results.dox index 4eee905446..6b0ac96e88 100644 --- a/deal.II/examples/step-32/doc/results.dox +++ b/deal.II/examples/step-32/doc/results.dox @@ -1,9 +1,15 @@

Results

When run, the program simulates convection in 3d in much the same way -as @ref step_31 "step-31" did -- in fact, the testcase is exactly the -same, just that we can now solve in parallel and with much higher -resolution. +as @ref step_31 "step-31" did, though with an entirely different testcase. + + +

Comparison of results with step-31

+ +Before we go to this testcase, however, let us show a few results from a +slightly earlier version of this program that was solving exactly the +testcase we used in step-31, just that we now solve it in parallel and with +much higher resolution. We show these results mainly for comparison. Here are two images that show this higher resolution if we choose a 3d computation in main() and if we set @@ -29,6 +35,10 @@ magnitude more than we had available in step-31: The computation was done on a subset of 50 processors of the Brazos cluster at Texas A&M University. + +

Results for a 2d circular shell testcase

+ + For a much more modest run (less mesh refinement, only 35 time steps, but 50 processors as above), we get this as output: -- 2.39.5