From 6238b47db13a219388ca68fd4aa19300dd763aa6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Guido Kanschat Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 17:06:14 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] move more images to homepage git-svn-id: https://svn.dealii.org/trunk@28188 0785d39b-7218-0410-832d-ea1e28bc413d --- deal.II/examples/step-22/doc/intro.dox | 4 +- deal.II/examples/step-32/doc/intro.dox | 6 +-- deal.II/examples/step-35/doc/intro.dox | 2 +- deal.II/examples/step-35/doc/results.dox | 32 ++++++++-------- deal.II/examples/step-4/doc/results.dox | 6 +-- deal.II/examples/step-41/doc/intro.dox | 4 +- deal.II/examples/step-41/doc/results.dox | 48 ++++++++++++------------ deal.II/examples/step-43/doc/results.dox | 8 ++-- deal.II/examples/step-44/doc/intro.dox | 2 +- deal.II/examples/step-44/doc/results.dox | 18 ++++----- deal.II/examples/step-46/doc/results.dox | 14 +++---- deal.II/examples/step-5/doc/results.dox | 12 +++--- deal.II/examples/step-6/doc/results.dox | 26 ++++++------- 13 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 91 deletions(-) diff --git a/deal.II/examples/step-22/doc/intro.dox b/deal.II/examples/step-22/doc/intro.dox index 5f6739836b..73a5674dac 100644 --- a/deal.II/examples/step-22/doc/intro.dox +++ b/deal.II/examples/step-22/doc/intro.dox @@ -761,7 +761,7 @@ A profile of how many CPU instructions are spent at the various different places in the program during refinement cycles zero through three in 3d is shown here: -@image html step-22.profile-3.png + As can be seen, at this refinement level approximately three quarters of the instruction count is spent on the actual solver (the SparseILU::vmult calls @@ -790,7 +790,7 @@ discussion of results below as well. As a final point, and as a point of reference, the following picture also shows how the profile looked at an early stage of optimizing this program: -@image html step-22.profile-3.original.png + As mentioned above, the runtime of this version was about four times as long as for the first profile, with the SparseILU decomposition taking up about diff --git a/deal.II/examples/step-32/doc/intro.dox b/deal.II/examples/step-32/doc/intro.dox index 143e8f6bfb..0770a81b41 100644 --- a/deal.II/examples/step-32/doc/intro.dox +++ b/deal.II/examples/step-32/doc/intro.dox @@ -511,7 +511,7 @@ program, and with a different viscosity that affects transport velocities and therefore time step sizes) in 2d will produce the following graph: -@image html step-32.beta.2d.png + As can be seen, values $\beta \le 0.05$ are too small whereas $\beta=0.052$ appears to work, at least to the time horizon shown @@ -541,7 +541,7 @@ viscosity $\nu$ and play with the constant $c_R$, making it as large as possible in order to make $\nu$ as small as possible. This gives us a picture like this: -@image html doc/step-32.beta_cr.2d.png + Consequently, $c_R=0.1$ would appear to be the right value here. While this graph has been obtained for an exponent $\alpha=1$, in the program we use @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ the following quantities: href="http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=plot+%28sqrt%28x^2%2By^2%29%2B0.2*%28sqrt%28x^2%2By^2%29*%281-sqrt%28x^2%2By^2%29%29*sin%286*atan2%28x%2Cy%29%29%29%2C+x%3D-1+to+1%2C+y%3D-1+to+1">this page): - @image html step-32.2d-initial.png + The point of this profile is that if we had used $s$ instead of $\tau$ in the definition of $T(\mathbf x)$ then it would simply be a linear diff --git a/deal.II/examples/step-35/doc/intro.dox b/deal.II/examples/step-35/doc/intro.dox index c85b26da4a..6a05992541 100644 --- a/deal.II/examples/step-35/doc/intro.dox +++ b/deal.II/examples/step-35/doc/intro.dox @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ vector-valued functions (e.g. divergences) becomes a little awkward, and others. The testcase that we use for this program consists of the flow around a square obstacle. The geometry is as follows: -@image html step-35.geometry.png + with $H=4.1$, making the geometry slightly non-symmetric. diff --git a/deal.II/examples/step-35/doc/results.dox b/deal.II/examples/step-35/doc/results.dox index e710df930e..c7da3a39fc 100644 --- a/deal.II/examples/step-35/doc/results.dox +++ b/deal.II/examples/step-35/doc/results.dox @@ -63,24 +63,24 @@ vorticity and in the right the velocity field: - - + + - - + + - - + + - - + + - - + +
@image html step-35.Re_100.vorticity.0.png @image html step-35.Re_100.velocity.0.png
@image html step-35.Re_100.vorticity.1.png @image html step-35.Re_100.velocity.1.png
@image html step-35.Re_100.vorticity.2.png @image html step-35.Re_100.velocity.2.png
@image html step-35.Re_100.vorticity.3.png @image html step-35.Re_100.velocity.3.png
@image html step-35.Re_100.vorticity.4.png @image html step-35.Re_100.velocity.4.png
@@ -98,12 +98,12 @@ yields the following images at times $t=20,40$: - - + + - - + +
@image html step-35.Re_500.vorticity.0.png @image html step-35.Re_500.velocity.0.png
@image html step-35.Re_500.vorticity.1.png @image html step-35.Re_500.velocity.1.png
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ small scale dynamics. The riddle is easily solved, however, by looking at a zoom at the region behind the obstacle, and the mesh size we have there: -@image html step-35.Re_500.zoom.png + It is clear here that the flow is still reasonably well resolved in the immediate wake of the obstacle, where the mesh is relatively fine, @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ finer mesh. A rerun with one more mesh refinement set in the parameter file confirms that results look much more sensible now: -@image html step-35.Re_500.zoom_2.png + Here, the zone where the mesh becomes coarser is immediately downstream of the big red blob at the bottom of the wake behind the diff --git a/deal.II/examples/step-4/doc/results.dox b/deal.II/examples/step-4/doc/results.dox index c76ae08055..4c7bf53bce 100644 --- a/deal.II/examples/step-4/doc/results.dox +++ b/deal.II/examples/step-4/doc/results.dox @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ you should play around with your favorite visualization tool to get familiar with its functionality. Here's what I have come up with for the 2d solution:

- @image html step-4.solution-2d.png +

The picture shows the solution of the problem under consideration as @@ -70,11 +70,11 @@ so that it is possible to see through them and see what's behind.
- @image html step-4.solution-3d.png + - @image html step-4.contours-3d.png +
diff --git a/deal.II/examples/step-41/doc/intro.dox b/deal.II/examples/step-41/doc/intro.dox index 0014f3fd56..d1ce5cef71 100644 --- a/deal.II/examples/step-41/doc/intro.dox +++ b/deal.II/examples/step-41/doc/intro.dox @@ -31,10 +31,10 @@ we should expect:
- @image html "step-41.displacement.png" + - @image html "step-41.active-set.png" +
diff --git a/deal.II/examples/step-41/doc/results.dox b/deal.II/examples/step-41/doc/results.dox index 0b87663985..7810a569ab 100644 --- a/deal.II/examples/step-41/doc/results.dox +++ b/deal.II/examples/step-41/doc/results.dox @@ -62,13 +62,13 @@ leftmost column): 0   - @image html step-41.displacement.00.png + - @image html step-41.active-set.00.png + - @image html step-41.displacement.3d.00.png + @@ -77,13 +77,13 @@ leftmost column): 3   - @image html step-41.displacement.03.png + - @image html step-41.active-set.03.png + - @image html step-41.displacement.3d.03.png + @@ -92,13 +92,13 @@ leftmost column): 6   - @image html step-41.displacement.06.png + - @image html step-41.active-set.06.png + - @image html step-41.displacement.3d.06.png + @@ -107,13 +107,13 @@ leftmost column): 9   - @image html step-41.displacement.09.png + - @image html step-41.active-set.09.png + - @image html step-41.displacement.3d.09.png + @@ -122,13 +122,13 @@ leftmost column): 12   - @image html step-41.displacement.12.png + - @image html step-41.active-set.12.png + - @image html step-41.displacement.3d.12.png + @@ -137,13 +137,13 @@ leftmost column): 15   - @image html step-41.displacement.15.png + - @image html step-41.active-set.15.png + - @image html step-41.displacement.3d.15.png + @@ -152,13 +152,13 @@ leftmost column): 18   - @image html step-41.displacement.18.png + - @image html step-41.active-set.18.png + - @image html step-41.displacement.3d.18.png + @@ -183,13 +183,13 @@ blue for negative values. diff --git a/deal.II/examples/step-43/doc/results.dox b/deal.II/examples/step-43/doc/results.dox index f07f8e2fc5..eec7e7732a 100644 --- a/deal.II/examples/step-43/doc/results.dox +++ b/deal.II/examples/step-43/doc/results.dox @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ pictures, so here is some output of a run in 3d:
- @image html step-41.forces.01.png + - @image html step-41.forces.09.png + - @image html step-41.forces.18.png +
- @image html "step-43.3d.velocity.png" +

Velocity vectors of flow through the porous medium with random permeability model. Streaming paths of high permeability and resulting @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ pictures, so here is some output of a run in 3d:

- @image html "step-43.3d.streamlines.png" +

Streamlines colored by the saturation along the streamline path. Blue streamlines indicate low saturations, i.e., the flow along these @@ -36,14 +36,14 @@ pictures, so here is some output of a run in 3d:

- @image html "step-43.3d.saturation.png" +

Streamlines with a volume rendering of the saturation, showing how far the fluid front has advanced at this time.

- @image html "step-43.3d.mesh.png" +

Surface of the mesh showing the adaptive refinement along the front.

diff --git a/deal.II/examples/step-44/doc/intro.dox b/deal.II/examples/step-44/doc/intro.dox index 1d08f5d3d9..79b68b3582 100644 --- a/deal.II/examples/step-44/doc/intro.dox +++ b/deal.II/examples/step-44/doc/intro.dox @@ -669,7 +669,7 @@ This benchmark problem is taken from 75 , 291-304. - @image html "step-44.setup.png" + The material is quasi-incompressible neo-Hookean with shear modulus $\mu = 80.194e6$ and $\nu = 0.4999$. For such a choice of material properties a conventional single-field $Q_1$ approach would lock. diff --git a/deal.II/examples/step-44/doc/results.dox b/deal.II/examples/step-44/doc/results.dox index c598762c7a..55e5746456 100644 --- a/deal.II/examples/step-44/doc/results.dox +++ b/deal.II/examples/step-44/doc/results.dox @@ -16,13 +16,13 @@ as it should.
- @image html "step-44.Q1-P0_convergence.png" +

Convergence of the $Q_1-DGPM_0-DGPM_0$ formulation.

- @image html "step-44.Q2-P1_convergence.png" +

Convergence of the $Q_2-DGPM_1-DGPM_1$ formulation.

@@ -138,19 +138,19 @@ and is opposite to the physically realistic interpretation of pressure.
- @image html "step-44.Q1-P0_gr_1_p_ratio_80-displacement.png" +

Z-displacement solution.

- @image html "step-44.Q1-P0_gr_1_p_ratio_80-pressure.png" +

Discontinuous piece-wise constant pressure field.

- @image html "step-44.Q1-P0_gr_1_p_ratio_80-dilatation.png" +

Discontinuous piece-wise constant dilatation field.

@@ -180,19 +180,19 @@ It should however be noted that the pressure field remains discontinuous
- @image html "step-44.Q2-P1_gr_3_p_ratio_80-displacement.png" +

Z-displacement solution.

- @image html "step-44.Q2-P1_gr_3_p_ratio_80-pressure.png" +

Discontinuous linear pressure field.

- @image html "step-44.Q2-P1_gr_3_p_ratio_80-dilatation.png" +

Discontinuous linear dilatation field.

@@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ some finite-strain problems involving alternative constitutive models.
- @image html "step-44.Normalised_runtime.png" +

Runtime on a 4-core machine, normalised against the lowest grid resolution $Q_1-DGPM_0-DGPM_0$ solution that utilised a SSOR preconditioner.

diff --git a/deal.II/examples/step-46/doc/results.dox b/deal.II/examples/step-46/doc/results.dox index a381b9400d..560002d05f 100644 --- a/deal.II/examples/step-46/doc/results.dox +++ b/deal.II/examples/step-46/doc/results.dox @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ The results are easily visualized:
- @image html step-46.velocity-magnitude.png +

Magnitude of the fluid velocity. @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ The results are easily visualized:

- @image html step-46.pressure.png +

Fluid pressure. The dynamic range has been truncated to cut off the @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ The results are easily visualized:

- @image html step-46.velocity.png +

Fluid velocity. @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ The results are easily visualized:

- @image html step-46.displacement.png +

Solid displacement. @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ The results can also be visualized and yield some good pictures:
- @image html step-46.3d.velocity.png +

Vectors of the fluid velocity and magnitude of the @@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ The results can also be visualized and yield some good pictures:

- @image html step-46.3d.streamlines.png +

Streamlines of the velocity, with the mesh superimposed. @@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ The results can also be visualized and yield some good pictures:

- @image html step-46.3d.displacement.png +

Solid displacement. diff --git a/deal.II/examples/step-5/doc/results.dox b/deal.II/examples/step-5/doc/results.dox index 171d21eb67..dec392e77b 100644 --- a/deal.II/examples/step-5/doc/results.dox +++ b/deal.II/examples/step-5/doc/results.dox @@ -66,28 +66,28 @@ format. They are depicted in the following:
- @image html step-5.solution-0.png + - @image html step-5.solution-1.png +
- @image html step-5.solution-2.png + - @image html step-5.solution-3.png +
- @image html step-5.solution-4.png + - @image html step-5.solution-5.png +
diff --git a/deal.II/examples/step-6/doc/results.dox b/deal.II/examples/step-6/doc/results.dox index 500c483c9e..9a93d10859 100644 --- a/deal.II/examples/step-6/doc/results.dox +++ b/deal.II/examples/step-6/doc/results.dox @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ The final solution, as written by the program at the end of the -@image html step-6.solution.png + @@ -60,37 +60,37 @@ format. These are shown in the following:
- @image html step-6.grid-0.png + - @image html step-6.grid-1.png +
- @image html step-6.grid-2.png + - @image html step-6.grid-3.png +
- @image html step-6.grid-4.png + - @image html step-6.grid-5.png +
- @image html step-6.grid-6.png + - @image html step-6.grid-7.png +
@@ -211,11 +211,11 @@ following results (left: iterations; right: CPU time):
- @image html step-6.q2.dofs_vs_iterations.png + - @image html step-6.q2.dofs_vs_time.png +
@@ -235,11 +235,11 @@ bi-linear one. If one makes this change, the results are as follows:
- @image html step-6.q1.dofs_vs_iterations.png + - @image html step-6.q1.dofs_vs_time.png +
-- 2.39.5