From 678d1f3befa68157a8e525e2a5e2f9365f5c7cc1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matthias Maier Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 04:48:53 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] fix a rendering issue with doxygen 1.9.3 --- examples/step-69/doc/intro.dox | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/examples/step-69/doc/intro.dox b/examples/step-69/doc/intro.dox index 27f73a166b..ddcfa08b13 100644 --- a/examples/step-69/doc/intro.dox +++ b/examples/step-69/doc/intro.dox @@ -254,8 +254,8 @@ advance the solution. This leaves very little reason to use vector-valued finite element spaces both in theory and/or practice. We will use the usual Lagrange finite elements: let $\{\mathbf{x}_i\}_{i \in -\mathcal{V}}$ denote the set of all support points (see @ref GlossSupport "this -glossary entry"), where $\mathbf{x}_i \in \mathbb{R}^d$. Then each index $i \in +\mathcal{V}}$ denote the set of all support points (see @ref GlossSupport "this glossary entry"), +where $\mathbf{x}_i \in \mathbb{R}^d$. Then each index $i \in \mathcal{V}$ uniquely identifies a support point $\mathbf{x}_i$, as well as a scalar-valued shape function $\phi_i$. With this notation at hand we can define the (explicit time stepping) scheme as: -- 2.39.5