From 7a3e0b2959788fd6438853542e286a660e84b652 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: wolf Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 19:13:42 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Minor doc fixes. git-svn-id: https://svn.dealii.org/trunk@9491 0785d39b-7218-0410-832d-ea1e28bc413d --- deal.II/lac/include/lac/sparse_direct.h | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/deal.II/lac/include/lac/sparse_direct.h b/deal.II/lac/include/lac/sparse_direct.h index be8f691f7c..3cbf8170df 100644 --- a/deal.II/lac/include/lac/sparse_direct.h +++ b/deal.II/lac/include/lac/sparse_direct.h @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ * documentation * of these functions. In practice, you will most often call the * second solve() function, which solves the linear system for a - * given right hand sidem but one can as well call the three functions + * given right hand side, but one can as well call the three functions * separately if, for example, one would like to solve the same matrix * for several right hand side vectors; the MA27 solver can do this * efficiently, as it computes a decomposition of the matrix, so that @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ * only states that the values have to be at least as large as * the estimates, a hint that is not very useful oftentimes (in my * humble opinion, the lack of dynamic memory allocation mechanism is - * a good reason not to program in Fortran 77...). + * a good reason not to program in Fortran 77 :-). * * In our experience, it is often necessary to go beyond the proposed * values (most often for LA, but also for LIW1). The first @@ -614,7 +614,7 @@ class SparseDirectMA27 : public Subscriptor * documentation * of these functions. In practice, one will most often call the * second solve() function, which solves the linear system for a given - * right hand sidem but one can as well call the three functions + * right hand side, but one can as well call the three functions * separately if, for example, one would like to solve the same matrix * for several right hand side vectors; the MA47 solver can do this * efficiently, as it computes a decomposition of the matrix, so that -- 2.39.5