From 8e5bc7eca1ba1433d5c5d5ea9743d1122e732255 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: kronbichler <kronbichler@0785d39b-7218-0410-832d-ea1e28bc413d>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 20:19:13 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] It does not make sense to test WorkStream with both empty
 worker and copier. Adjust the test case.

git-svn-id: https://svn.dealii.org/trunk@32190 0785d39b-7218-0410-832d-ea1e28bc413d
---
 tests/base/work_stream_04.cc | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tests/base/work_stream_04.cc b/tests/base/work_stream_04.cc
index c760c2c523..ebda814629 100644
--- a/tests/base/work_stream_04.cc
+++ b/tests/base/work_stream_04.cc
@@ -30,16 +30,34 @@ struct ScratchData
 {};
 
 
+void foo (const std::vector<unsigned int>::iterator,
+          ScratchData&,
+          unsigned int&)
+{
+}
+
+void bar (const unsigned int&)
+{
+}
+
 void test ()
 {
   std::vector<unsigned int> v;
   for (unsigned int i=0; i<20; ++i)
     v.push_back (i);
 
+  // first run with only a worker
+  WorkStream::run (v.begin(), v.end(),
+                   &foo,
+                   std_cxx1x::function<void(const unsigned int&)>(),
+                   ScratchData(),
+                   0U);
+  
+  // next run with only a copier
   WorkStream::run (v.begin(), v.end(),
                    std_cxx1x::function<void(const std::vector<unsigned int>::iterator,
                                             ScratchData&,unsigned int&)>(),
-                   std_cxx1x::function<void(const unsigned int&)>(),
+                   &bar,
                    ScratchData(),
                    0U);
 }
-- 
2.39.5