From 8eff8978efe137ded6226d80129f91454d517666 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jiaqi Zhang Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 19:19:03 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Update examples/step-74/doc/intro.dox Co-authored-by: Wolfgang Bangerth --- examples/step-74/doc/intro.dox | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/examples/step-74/doc/intro.dox b/examples/step-74/doc/intro.dox index 9e5c1c50a3..901c8029b2 100644 --- a/examples/step-74/doc/intro.dox +++ b/examples/step-74/doc/intro.dox @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ People do not really have consensus on which precise formula to choose, among wh One can just pick a large constant, while other options could be the multiples of $(p+1)^2$ or $p(p+1)$. In this code, we follow step-39 and use $\gamma = p(p+1)$. -

Posteriori error estimator

+

A posteriori error estimator

In this example, we use the error estimator by Karakashian and Pascal @cite karakashian2003posteriori @f[ \eta^2 = \sum_{K \in \Gamma_h} \eta^2_{K} + \sum_{f_i \in F^i_h} \eta^2_{f_i} + \sum_{f_b \in F^i_b}\eta^2_{f_b} -- 2.39.5