From a0f02aa54fda01c034dff8ce9669f7982060f994 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Wolfgang Bangerth Date: Thu, 9 Apr 1998 09:23:17 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] . git-svn-id: https://svn.dealii.org/trunk@165 0785d39b-7218-0410-832d-ea1e28bc413d --- deal.II/deal.II/Todo | 22 +++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/deal.II/deal.II/Todo b/deal.II/deal.II/Todo index 390bf866fd..240974304f 100644 --- a/deal.II/deal.II/Todo +++ b/deal.II/deal.II/Todo @@ -39,11 +39,6 @@ implement ProblemBase::distribute_cell_to_dof_vector Remove gcc2.8 workaround with DoFSubstructAccessor -Replace verbatim implementation of setw(int) in parameter-handler.cc - when a reasonable (linkable) library implementation is available - again. - - Use the C++ standard string classes instead of the libg++ String class. @@ -56,18 +51,23 @@ Invent a FEFaceValues class representing the restriction of a FE to Let the FE objects take DoF-iterators rather than Tria-iterators. + Check usage of vectors: functions should assume that the objects have the right size already. -Set dirichlet bc to the solution vector after solving (setting it - beforehand is not enough, the search directions for CG contain - components in the directions of these nodes, even if they are not - coupled to the other dofs. Strange.) -Update DataIO for ucd i/o of boundary flags and material values. -Update DataIO for ucd i/o of boundary flags and material values. +Update DataIO for ucd i/o of boundary flags and material values: + is it correct if for the number of elements I give the number + of cells + number of faces with boundary id .neq. 0 ? Or must + I give the number of cells? + + +Update DoFHandler::distribute_cell_to_dof_vector for higher order + elements (it can presently only handle elements with the only dofs + on the vertices). +Use auto_ptr when available for the DataOut::boundary_faces function. -- 2.39.5