From b5771dd81bdd1a08d406c555ef18bf6ff933eba0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Wolfgang Bangerth Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 04:51:03 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Fix two bad references. git-svn-id: https://svn.dealii.org/trunk@20966 0785d39b-7218-0410-832d-ea1e28bc413d --- deal.II/doc/doxygen/headers/glossary.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/deal.II/doc/doxygen/headers/glossary.h b/deal.II/doc/doxygen/headers/glossary.h index a63bc9e2a4..cea9638436 100644 --- a/deal.II/doc/doxygen/headers/glossary.h +++ b/deal.II/doc/doxygen/headers/glossary.h @@ -198,12 +198,12 @@ * On the other hand, when talking about finite elements and degrees of * freedom, components are not always the correct concept because * components are not always individually addressable. In particular, this is - * the case for @refGlossPrimitive "non-primitive finite elements". Similarly, + * the case for @ref GlossPrimitive "non-primitive finite elements". Similarly, * one may not always want to address individual components but rather * sets of components — e.g. all velocity components together, and * separate from the pressure in the Stokes system, without further splitting * the velocities into their individual components. In either case, the - * correct concept to think in is that of a @ref GlossBlockFE "block". Since + * correct concept to think in is that of a @ref GlossBlock "block". Since * each component, if individually addressable, is also a block, thinking in * terms of blocks is most frequently the better strategy. * -- 2.39.5