From b6d091921a341670460df1792c6edae4c9067220 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Wolfgang Bangerth Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 08:15:03 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] Add two annotations. --- 9.5/paper.tex | 10 +++++++++- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/9.5/paper.tex b/9.5/paper.tex index 7724156..40e2efb 100644 --- a/9.5/paper.tex +++ b/9.5/paper.tex @@ -500,7 +500,15 @@ the three external solvers with a unified interface. The user can either let \dealii{} decide which of the packages to use (depending on the current availability of the external packages) or specify it manually. -Here is a complete example of an MPI parallel Newton solver that automatically chooses one of the available packages: +Here is a complete example of an MPI parallel Newton solver that +automatically chooses one of the available packages: +\todo[inline]{The NOX example was nicely indented. Can we do the same + here? Perhaps if we call the variable \texttt{nl\_solver}?} +\todo[inline]{But separately: Does the code snippet really provide any + additional value? It is for all practical purposes identical to the + NOX one, and the NOX one is already identical to the SNES one. Do we +need to repeat things a third time, or could one just use one or two +sentences to express the same?} \begin{c++} using NLSolver = NonlinearSolverSelector; -- 2.39.5