From be869c7f4b389ab7640ceb1e5b21436179cdea76 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Wells Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2016 18:01:23 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Improve the word order in a dependent clause. --- examples/step-22/doc/intro.dox | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/examples/step-22/doc/intro.dox b/examples/step-22/doc/intro.dox index 91efc89a92..b795f8a79c 100644 --- a/examples/step-22/doc/intro.dox +++ b/examples/step-22/doc/intro.dox @@ -564,8 +564,8 @@ matrix. It is therefore an operation that can efficiently also be computed in represent an exact inverse of the matrix $A$. Consequently, preconditioning with the ILU will still require more than one iteration, unlike preconditioning with the sparse direct solver. The inner solver will therefore -take more time when multiplying with the Schur complement, a trade-off -unavoidable. +take more time when multiplying with the Schur complement: an unavoidable +trade-off. In the program below, we will make use of the fact that the SparseILU and -- 2.39.5