From c240f3db29ef930ff00012da29fc215aac88d821 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Wolfgang Bangerth Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 18:19:16 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Escape 'parallel'. git-svn-id: https://svn.dealii.org/trunk@19305 0785d39b-7218-0410-832d-ea1e28bc413d --- deal.II/examples/step-9/doc/intro.dox | 26 +++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/deal.II/examples/step-9/doc/intro.dox b/deal.II/examples/step-9/doc/intro.dox index b5d501921b..8659188ddc 100644 --- a/deal.II/examples/step-9/doc/intro.dox +++ b/deal.II/examples/step-9/doc/intro.dox @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ augmented by boundary conditions: where $\partial\Omega_-$ describes the inflow portion of the boundary and is formally defined by @f[ - \partial\Omega_- + \partial\Omega_- = \{{\mathbf x}\in \partial\Omega: \beta\cdot{\mathbf n}({\mathbf x}) < 0\}, @f] @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ pose any boundary condition on the outflow part of the boundary. As it is stated, the transport equation is not stably solvable using the standard finite element method, however. The problem is that solutions to this equation possess only insufficient regularity -orthogonal to the transport direction: while they are smooth parallel +orthogonal to the transport direction: while they are smooth %parallel to $\beta$, they may be discontinuous perpendicular to this direction. These discontinuities lead to numerical instabilities that make a stable solution by a straight-forward discretization @@ -98,8 +98,8 @@ to be inverted of the form with basis functions $\varphi_i,\varphi_j$. However, this is a pitfall that happens to every numerical analyst at least once (including the author): we have here expanded the solution -$u_h = u_i \varphi_i$, but if we do so, we will have to solve the -problem +$u_h = u_i \varphi_i$, but if we do so, we will have to solve the +problem @f[ {\mathbf u}^T A = {\mathbf f}^T, @f] @@ -138,23 +138,23 @@ Regarding the exact form of the problem which we will solve, we use the following domain and functions (in $d=2$ space dimensions): @f{eqnarray*} \Omega &=& [-1,1]^d \\ - \beta({\mathbf x}) + \beta({\mathbf x}) &=& \left( - \begin{array}{c}1 \\ 1+\frac 45 \sin(8\pi x)\end{array} + \begin{array}{c}1 \\ 1+\frac 45 \sin(8\pi x)\end{array} \right), \\ f({\mathbf x}) &=& \left\{ \begin{array}{ll} - \frac 1{10 s^d} & + \frac 1{10 s^d} & \mathrm{for}\ |{\mathbf x}-{\mathbf x}_0| The inflow boundary conditions impose a weighted sinusoidal -structure that is transported along with the flow field. Since -$|{\mathbf x}|\ge 1$ on the boundary, the weighting term never gets very large. +structure that is transported along with the flow field. Since +$|{\mathbf x}|\ge 1$ on the boundary, the weighting term never gets very large. @@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ shown that this error indicator uses a discrete analogue of the second derivatives, weighted by a power of the cell size that is adjusted to the linear elements assumed to be in use here: @f[ - \eta_K \approx + \eta_K \approx C h \| \nabla^2 u \|_K, @f] which itself is related to the error size in the energy norm. @@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ approximate the directional derivative of a function $u$ as follows: \frac{u(K') - u(K)}{|{\mathbf y}_{KK'}|}, @f] where $u(K)$ and $u(K')$ denote $u$ evaluated at the centers of the -respective cells. We now multiply the above approximation by +respective cells. We now multiply the above approximation by ${\mathbf y}_{KK'}/|{\mathbf y}_{KK'}|$ and sum over all neighbors $K'$ of $K$: @f[ \underbrace{ @@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ criterion: @f] which is inspired by the following (not rigorous) argument: @f{eqnarray*} - \|u-u_h\|^2_{L_2} + \|u-u_h\|^2_{L_2} &\le& C h^2 \|\nabla u\|^2_{L_2} \\ -- 2.39.5