From c772d6ab6969de3e3f00f984a577c4e52f1ae51f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: pauletti <pauletti@0785d39b-7218-0410-832d-ea1e28bc413d>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 21:34:35 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Small changes to documentation of step-38

git-svn-id: https://svn.dealii.org/trunk@23060 0785d39b-7218-0410-832d-ea1e28bc413d
---
 deal.II/examples/step-38/doc/intro.dox   |  7 ++++---
 deal.II/examples/step-38/doc/results.dox | 13 ++++++++-----
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/deal.II/examples/step-38/doc/intro.dox b/deal.II/examples/step-38/doc/intro.dox
index ea30923933..0d4cb87c1e 100644
--- a/deal.II/examples/step-38/doc/intro.dox
+++ b/deal.II/examples/step-38/doc/intro.dox
@@ -123,9 +123,10 @@ and
 In general when you want to test numerically the accuracy and/or 
 order of convergence of an algorithm you need to provide an exact
 solution. 
-The usual trick is to pick a function that we want to be the solution applied 
-the differential operator to define a forcing term for the right hand side.
+The usual trick is to pick a function that we want to be the solution,
+then apply the differential operator to it that defines a forcing term 
+for the right hand side.
 This is what we do in this example.
-
+We produce one test case for a 2d problem and another one for the 3d one.
 
 Mapping objects
diff --git a/deal.II/examples/step-38/doc/results.dox b/deal.II/examples/step-38/doc/results.dox
index 8608c72dd8..641e0fb7e4 100644
--- a/deal.II/examples/step-38/doc/results.dox
+++ b/deal.II/examples/step-38/doc/results.dox
@@ -8,9 +8,11 @@ Surface mesh has 5185 degrees of freedom.
 H1 error = 0.0221245
 @endverbatim
 
-By playing around with the number of global refinements in teh
-<code>LaplaceBeltrami::make_mesh</code> function you increase or decrease mesh
-refinement. For example, doing one more refinement yields the following
+
+By playing around with the number of global refinements in the
+<code>LaplaceBeltrami::make_grid_and_dofs</code> function you increase or decrease mesh
+refinement. For example, doing one more refinement and only running the 3d surface
+problem yields the following
 output:
 
 @verbatim
@@ -34,6 +36,7 @@ this, neatly following the theoretically predicted pattern:
 Finally, the program produces graphical output that we can visualize. Here is
 a plot of the results:
 
+@image html step-38.solution-2d.png
 @image html step-38.solution-3d.png
 
 
@@ -76,7 +79,7 @@ Point<dim> warp (const Point<dim> &p)
 }
 @endcode
 
-If we followed the <code>LaplaceBeltrami::make_mesh</code> function, we would
+If we followed the <code>LaplaceBeltrami::make_grid_and_dofs</code> function, we would
 extract the 5/6th spherical surface mesh as before, warp it into the shape we
 want, and refine as often as necessary. This is not quite as simple as we'd
 like here, though: refining requires that we have an appropriate manifold
@@ -93,7 +96,7 @@ above, this would look as follows:
 
 @code
 template <int dim>
-void LaplaceBeltrami<dim>::make_mesh ()
+void LaplaceBeltrami<dim>::make_grid_and_dofs ()
 {
   HyperBallBoundary<dim> boundary_description;
   Triangulation<dim> volume_mesh;
-- 
2.39.5