From d503c975d5e8faf0701a94a8bdd6408b89a62736 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: wolf Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 22:10:13 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] . git-svn-id: https://svn.dealii.org/trunk@9008 0785d39b-7218-0410-832d-ea1e28bc413d --- .../doc/tutorial/chapter-2.step-by-step/step-15.data/intro.tex | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/deal.II/doc/tutorial/chapter-2.step-by-step/step-15.data/intro.tex b/deal.II/doc/tutorial/chapter-2.step-by-step/step-15.data/intro.tex index fff1678e5a..4a1d49268b 100644 --- a/deal.II/doc/tutorial/chapter-2.step-by-step/step-15.data/intro.tex +++ b/deal.II/doc/tutorial/chapter-2.step-by-step/step-15.data/intro.tex @@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ is that if you don't have a good line search, good stopping criteria, the right metric (scalar product) for the gradient method, and a good refinement criterion, then the nonlinear solver gets stuck quite readily for this highly nonlinear problem. Initially, I was hardly able to find solutions for which -the energy dropped below 0.01, while the energy after the final iteration of +the energy dropped below 0.005, while the energy after the final iteration of the program as it is is usually around 0.0003, and down to 3.5e-5. However, this is not enough. In the program, we start the solver on the coarse -- 2.39.5