From d9b936ac8ac3e919ce0864f6f440ade90d8d8ff3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: bangerth Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:57:40 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Fix awkward wording. git-svn-id: https://svn.dealii.org/trunk@23663 0785d39b-7218-0410-832d-ea1e28bc413d --- deal.II/examples/step-46/doc/results.dox | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/deal.II/examples/step-46/doc/results.dox b/deal.II/examples/step-46/doc/results.dox index e96291f8c8..701fbf7755 100644 --- a/deal.II/examples/step-46/doc/results.dox +++ b/deal.II/examples/step-46/doc/results.dox @@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ would be a good preconditioner if $\widetilde{A_{\text{fluid}}^{-1}} \approx A_{\text{solid}}^{-1}$. That means, we only need good preconditioners for Stokes and the -elasticity equations separately. These are well known, however: for +elasticity equations separately. These are well known: for Stokes, we can use the preconditioner discussed in the results section of step-22; for elasticity, a good preconditioner would be a single V-cycle of a geometric or algebraic multigrid. There are more open -- 2.39.5