From dabc7473ac0dcf3942efd1f16915a79de341948f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: wolf Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 12:59:20 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Update Todo file. git-svn-id: https://svn.dealii.org/trunk@1147 0785d39b-7218-0410-832d-ea1e28bc413d --- deal.II/deal.II/Todo | 20 -------------------- 1 file changed, 20 deletions(-) diff --git a/deal.II/deal.II/Todo b/deal.II/deal.II/Todo index 8a32331c3b..395e5d70a0 100644 --- a/deal.II/deal.II/Todo +++ b/deal.II/deal.II/Todo @@ -22,9 +22,6 @@ Unify CellAccessor<1> and <2> by renaming QuadAccessor -> SubstructAccessor and deriving CellAccessor from SubstructAccessor Do the same with DoFLineAccessor and DoFQuadAccessor - - -Make AssemblerData a local class to Assembler again if gcc2.8 supports it. Remove gcc2.8 workaround with DoFSubstructAccessor for general @@ -34,12 +31,6 @@ Check usage of vector<>s: functions should assume that the objects have the right size already. -Update DataIO for ucd i/o of boundary flags and material values: - is it correct if for the number of elements I give the number - of cells + number of faces with boundary id .neq. 0 ? Or must - I give the number of cells? - - Update DoFHandler::distribute_cell_to_dof_vector for higher order elements (it can presently only handle elements with the only dofs on the vertices). @@ -53,14 +44,6 @@ Look at the fill_fe_values functions for possible optimizations since this is one of the most often called functions. -Try to find out what happens if DoFAccessor::get_dof_values is - called for a non-active object: what about dof numbers - on non-active lines/quads? Are they all -1? Can we check for - that. The problem is that we can't really check for activity - for faces and the like, since they may have children but be - part of active cells anyway. - - Change to in grid/point.h and grid/tria_iterator.h when this becomes possible. @@ -127,9 +110,6 @@ I suppose the [mg_]get_dof_values really belongs to the FeValues: add flexibility for update flags -Remove all fe& in vectors.h - - No support points for non-Lagrangian elements? Check for Langrange in interpolation? -- 2.39.5