From f4dfa4dd516e6a8618627e295a3b18b1ea2d5604 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: wolf Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2000 15:32:08 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Tripped on that condition and now think that it is wrong: constrained non-Lagrange nodes are eliminated from the system and are therefore not accessed by any of the local systems. Therefore, the assertion was wrong. git-svn-id: https://svn.dealii.org/trunk@2338 0785d39b-7218-0410-832d-ea1e28bc413d --- deal.II/lac/include/lac/sparse_vanka.templates.h | 5 ----- 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/deal.II/lac/include/lac/sparse_vanka.templates.h b/deal.II/lac/include/lac/sparse_vanka.templates.h index 3f33a0e410..a2abf3c700 100644 --- a/deal.II/lac/include/lac/sparse_vanka.templates.h +++ b/deal.II/lac/include/lac/sparse_vanka.templates.h @@ -544,11 +544,6 @@ SparseBlockVanka::SparseBlockVanka (const SparseMatrix &M, max_accesses = access_count[block][row]; max_access_block = block; }; - // each dof should be - // accessed by at least - // one block! - Assert (max_accesses > 0, ExcInternalError()); - dof_masks[max_access_block][row] = true; }; -- 2.39.5