From 03de1a22a06fd4c89c3e6e2816ac80b91155836c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jean-Paul Pelteret Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 21:46:13 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Fix more typos in intro to step-71 --- examples/step-71/doc/intro.dox | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/examples/step-71/doc/intro.dox b/examples/step-71/doc/intro.dox index da49cab908..6652a2820c 100644 --- a/examples/step-71/doc/intro.dox +++ b/examples/step-71/doc/intro.dox @@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ one another then, for each mechanism `i`, \frac{\partial \psi_{0}}{\partial \mathbf{C}_{v}^{i}} : \dot{\mathbf{C}}_{v}^{i} \leq 0 . @f] -This constraint must be satisfies through the appropriate choice of free energy +This constraint must be satisfied through the appropriate choice of free energy function, as well as a carefully considered evolution law for the internal variables. @@ -489,7 +489,7 @@ law is defined.
Magneto-viscoelastic constitutive law
-The second material that we'll formulate is one that for a +The second material that we'll formulate is one for a magneto-viscoelastic material with a single dissipative mechanism `i`. The *free energy density function* that we'll be considering is defined as @f{align*}{ @@ -665,7 +665,7 @@ for this particular problem, we will also be computing the tangents as well. Even though they are not directly used in this particular piece of work, these second derivatives are needed to embed the constitutive law within a finite element model (one possible extension to this work). We'll therefore -take the opportunity to checked our hand calculations for correctness using +take the opportunity to check our hand calculations for correctness using the assisted differentiation frameworks.

Suggested literature

-- 2.39.5