From d8f3ee4e0f90e7d8f95866f24ca07f16c99338ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Wolfgang Bangerth Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 16:37:02 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] Fix width of pictures. --- examples/step-35/doc/results.dox | 32 ++++++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/examples/step-35/doc/results.dox b/examples/step-35/doc/results.dox index 9d8ea02f78..230f26c214 100644 --- a/examples/step-35/doc/results.dox +++ b/examples/step-35/doc/results.dox @@ -63,24 +63,24 @@ vorticity and in the right the velocity field: - - + + - - + + - - + + - - + + - - + +
@@ -98,12 +98,12 @@ yields the following images at times $t=20,40$: - - + + - - + +
@@ -117,12 +117,12 @@ the geometry is large. We look at a zoom at the region behind the obstacle, and the mesh size we have there: - + We can easily test our hypothesis by re-running the simulation with one more mesh refinement set in the parameter file: - + Indeed, the vorticity field now looks much smoother. While we can expect that further refining the mesh will suppress the remaining oscillations as well, -- 2.39.5