From 1eebb628748935aff4e3905be8bedbb71df0e1a4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lei Qiao Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 11:53:37 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] correct type of output example from 'code' to 'verbatim' --- examples/step-33/doc/results.dox | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/examples/step-33/doc/results.dox b/examples/step-33/doc/results.dox index 6736cfd913..f25a9967a7 100644 --- a/examples/step-33/doc/results.dox +++ b/examples/step-33/doc/results.dox @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ end @endverbatim When we run the program, we get the following kind of output: -@code +@verbatim ... T=0.14 Number of active cells: 1807 @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ T=0.18 4.091e-09 0008 3.35e-19 5.617e-16 (converged) ... -@endcode +@endverbatim This output reports the progress of the Newton iterations and the time stepping. Note that our implementation of the Newton iteration indeed shows @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ in each step is roughly the norm of the previous step squared. This leads to the very rapid convergence we can see here. This holds until times up to $t=1.9$ at which time the nonlinear iteration reports a lack of convergence: -@code +@verbatim ... T=1.88 @@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ No convergence in nonlinear solver Aborting! ---------------------------------------------------- -@endcode +@endverbatim We may find out the cause and possible remedies by looking at the animation of the solution. -- 2.39.5