From 7d439b5f948e90b6cb242a986993c3a5f0d5dce2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: grahambenharper Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 10:12:39 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Fix header names in step-61 --- examples/step-61/doc/results.dox | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/examples/step-61/doc/results.dox b/examples/step-61/doc/results.dox index 7b2b90d311..8ab4661bc2 100644 --- a/examples/step-61/doc/results.dox +++ b/examples/step-61/doc/results.dox @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ have symmetric solutions. From the 3d figures on the right, we can see that on $\mbox{WG}(Q_0,Q_0;RT_{[0]})$, the pressure is a constant in the interior of the cell, as expected. -

Convergence table

+

Convergence table for k=0

We run the code with differently refined meshes (chosen in the `make_grid()` function) and get the following convergence rates of pressure, @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ particular so close to being continuous at the interfaces that we can no longer distinguish the interface pressures $p^\partial$ from the interior pressures $p^\circ$ on the adjacent cells. -

Convergence table

+

Convergence table for k=1

The following are the convergence rates of pressure, velocity, and flux we obtain from using the $\mbox{WG}(Q_1,Q_1;RT_{[1]})$ element combination: @@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ visualization of the quadratic polynomials. -

Convergence table

+

Convergence table for k=2

As before, we can generate convergence data for the $L_2$ errors of pressure, velocity, and flux -- 2.39.5